Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Imagine that you are holding 5,000 shares of stock, currently selling at \(40 per share. You are ready to sell the shares but would prefer to put off the sale until next year due to tax reasons. If you continue to hold the shares until January, however, you face the risk that the stock will drop in value before year-end. You decide to use a collar to limit downside risk without laying out a good deal of additional funds. January call options with a strike price of \)45 are selling at \(2, and January puts with a strike price of \)35 are selling at \(3. What will be the value of your portfolio in January (net of the proceeds from the options) if the stock price ends up at (a) \)30? (b) \(40? (c) \)50?

Compare these proceeds to what you would realize if you simply continued to hold the shares.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. $150,000

b. $200,000

c. $250,000

d. net proceeds per share varies in between $34 and the $44 and total net proceeds with 5000 share will be between $170,000 and $220,000

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Initial outlay = purchasing a put at $3 – selling a call for $2 = $1

02

Calculation of net proceeds at $30 ‘a’

ST = $30

Value at expiration = Value of call + Value of put + Value of stock

= $0 + ($35 – $30) + $30

= $35

The total net proceeds with 5,000 shares = (Final Value – Original Investment) x # of shares

= ($35 – $1) x 5,000

= $170,000

Net proceeds (without using collar) = ST x # of shares

= $30 x 5,000

= $150,000.

03

Calculation of net proceeds at $40 ‘b’

ST = $40

Value at expiration = Value of call + Value of put + Value of stock

= 0 + 0 + $40

= $40

The total net proceeds with 5,000 shares: (Final value – Original investment) x # of shares

= ($40 – $1) x 5,000

= $195,000

Net proceeds (without using collar) = ST x # of shares

= $40 x 5,000

= $200,000

04

Calculation of net proceeds at $50 ‘c’

ST = $50

Value at expiration = Value of call + Value of put + Value of stock

= ($45 – $50) + 0 + $50

=$45

The total net proceeds with 5,000 shares: (Final value – Original investment) x # of shares

= ($45 – $1) x 5,000

= $220,000

Net proceeds (without using collar) = ST x # of shares

= $50 x 5,000

= $250,000

05

Explanation on comparison ‘d’

With the initial outlay of $1, the net proceeds per share varies in between the lower bound of $34 and the upper bound of $44.

The total net proceeds with 5000 share will be between $170,000 and $220,000

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You purchase a Treasury-bond futures contract with an initial margin requirement of 15% and a futures price of \(115,098. The contract is traded on a \)100,000 underlying par value bond. If the futures price falls to $108,000, what will be the percentage loss on your position?

Consider an increase in the volatility of the stock in the previous problem. Suppose that if the stock increases in price, it will increase to \(130, and that if it falls, it will fall to \)70. Show that the value of the call option is higher than the value derived using the original assumptions.

Show that Black-Scholes call option hedge ratios increase as the stock price increases. Consider a one-year option with exercise price \(50 on a stock with annual standard deviation 20%. The T-bill rate is 3% per year. Find N (d1) for stock prices \)45, \(50, and \)55.

Joseph Jones, a manager at Computer Science, Inc. (CSI), received 10,000 shares of company stock as part of his compensation package. The stock currently sells at \(40 a share. Joseph would like to defer selling the stock until the next tax year. In January, however, he will need to sell all his holdings to provide for a down payment on his new house. Joseph is worried about the price risk involved in keeping his shares. At current prices, he would receive \)40,000 for the stock. If the value of his stock holdings falls below \(35,000, his ability to come up with the necessary down payment would be jeopardized.

On the other hand, if the stock value rises to \)45,000, he would be able to maintain a small cash reserve even after making the down payment. Joseph considers three investment strategies:

a. Strategy A is to write January call options on the CSI shares with strike price \(45. These calls are currently selling for \)3 each.

b. Strategy B is to buy January put options on CSI with strike price \(35. These options also sell for \)3 each.

c. Strategy C is to establish a zero-cost collar by writing the January calls and buying the January puts.

Evaluate each of these strategies with respect to Joseph’s investment goals. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? Which would you recommend?

Michael Weber, CFA, is analyzing several aspects of option valuation, including the determinants of the value of an option, the characteristics of various models used to value options, and the potential for divergence of calculated option values from observed market prices.

a. What is the expected effect on the value of a call option on common stock if (i) the volatility of the underlying stock price decreases; (ii) the time to expiration of the option increases.

b. Using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, Weber calculates the price of a three-month call option and notices the option’s calculated value is different from its market price. With respect to Weber’s use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, (i) discuss why the calculated value of an out-of-the-money European option may differ from its market price; (ii) discuss why the calculated value of an American option may differ from its market price.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free