Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As part of your analysis of debt issued by Monticello Corporation, you are asked to evaluate two specific bond issues, shown in the table below:

Monticello Corporation Bond Information

Coupon

Bond A (Callable)

Bond B (Non-callable)

Maturity

2019

2019

Coupon

11.50%

7.25%

Current Price

125.75

100.00

Yield to Maturity

7.70%

7.25%

Modified duration to maturity

6.20

6.80

Call Date

2013

----

Call Price

105

-----

Yield to Call

5.10%

-----

Modified duration to call

3.10

------

a. Using the duration and yield information in the table, compare the price and yield behavior of the two bonds under each of the following two scenarios:

i. Strong economic recovery with rising inflation expectations.

ii. Economic recession with reduced inflation expectations.

b. Using the information in the table, calculate the projected price change for bond B if the yield-to-maturity for this bond falls by 75 basis points.

c. Describe the shortcoming of analyzing bond A strictly to call or to maturity.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. (i) Interest rates and bond yields will rise, and the prices of both bonds will fall

(ii) Interest rates and bond yields will fall

b. $105.10.

c. Uncertain bond life and cash flow, long durations and high yields, distorted calculations for yield and duration.

Step by step solution

01

Comparison of price-yield behavior in different scenarios

(i) In this scenario, it is very likely that Interest rates and bond yields will rise, and the prices of both bonds will fall. It will also lessen the probability of the callable bond is called.

(ii) In this scenario, it is very likely that Interest rates and bond yields will fall. The lower duration indicates that its price appreciation is limited. On the other hand, the non-callable bond has the same modified duration and hence the greater price appreciation.

02

Calculation of projected price change for Bond B

Since the YTM on Bond B has fallen by 75 basis points:

Projected price change = (modified duration) x (change in YTM)

= (–6.80) x (–0.75%)

= 5.1%

So the approximate price rises up to $105.10.

03

Explanation of the shortcoming of analyzing bond A

There are several shortcomings:

(i) Its bond life and bond cash flows are uncertain.

(ii) Durations are too long and yields are too high but it is unrealistically short and yields too low if it is sold above the call price.

(iii) On ignoring the call feature and analyzing the bond, all calculations for yield and duration are distorted.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a bond with a 10% coupon and with yield to maturity 5 8%. If the bond’s YTM remains constant, then in one year will the bond price be higher, lower, or unchanged? Why?

What is the option embedded in a callable bond? A puttable bond?

You buy an eight-year bond that has a 6% current yield and a 6% coupon (paid annually). In one year, promised yields to maturity have risen to 7%. What is your holding-period return?

One common goal among fixed-income portfolio managers is to earn high incremental returns on corporate bonds versus government bonds of comparable durations. The approach of some corporate-bond portfolio managers is to find and purchase those corporate bonds having the largest initial spreads over comparable-duration government bonds. John Ames, HFS’s fixed-income manager, believes that a more rigorous approach is required if incremental returns are to be maximized. The following table presents data relating to one set of corporate/government spread relationships (in basis points, bp) present in the market at a given date:

CURRENT AND EXPECTED SPREADS AND DURATIONS

OF HIGH-GRADE CORPORATE BONDS (ONE-YEAR HORIZON)

Bond Ratings

Initial spread over governments

Expected horizon spread

Initial duration

Expected duration one year from now

Aaa

31 bp

31 bp

4 years

3.1 Years

Aa

40

50

4 years

3.1 Years

a. Recommend purchase of either Aaa or Aa bonds for a one-year investment horizon given a goal of maximizing incremental returns.

b. Ames chooses not to rely solely on initial spread relationships. His analytical framework considers a full range of other key variables likely to impact realized incremental returns, including call provisions and potential changes in interest rates. Describe other variables that Ames should include in his analysis, and explain how each of these could cause realized incremental returns to differ from those indicated by initial spread relationships.

On May 30, 2009, Janice Kerr is considering the newly issued 10-year AAA corporate bonds shown in the following exhibit:

Description

Coupon

Price

Callable

Call Price

Sentinal due, May 30, 2019

6.00%

100

Non-callable

NA

Collina due, May 30, 2019

6.20%

100

Currently callabale

102

a. Suppose that market interest rates decline by 100 basis points (i.e., 1%). Contrast the effect of this decline on the price of each bond.

b. Should Kerr prefer the Colina over the Sentinal bond when rates are expected to rise or to fall?

c. What would be the effect, if any, of an increase in the volatility of interest rates on the prices of each bond?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free