Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Go to the Online Learning Center at www.mhhe.com/bkm , link to Chapter 20, and find there a spreadsheet containing monthly values of the S&P 500 Index. Suppose that in each month you had written an out-of-the-money put option on one unit of the index with an exercise price 5% lower than the current value of the index.

a. What would have been the average value of your gross monthly payouts on the puts over the 10-year period October 1977–September 1987? The standard deviation?

b. Now extend your sample by one month to include October 1987, and recalculate the average payout and standard deviation of the put-writing strategy. What do you conclude about tail risk in naked put writing?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Average gross monthly payout = 0.2437; standard deviation = 1.0951

b. Average gross monthly payout = 0.6875; standard deviation = 5.0026

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of average value of gross monthly payouts ‘a’

As per the spreadsheet from the link, end of month value for S&P 500 in September 1977 was $96.53

Hence exercise price of the put at the beginning of October 1977:

Exercise price of put=Exercise price×Value of index=95%×$96.53=$91.7035

At the end of the October, the value of index is 92.34, hence put would have expired out of money and writer’s payout was zero.

The first month with positive payout = January 1978

The exercise price for its put for beginning January:

Exercise price of put=Exercise price×Value of index=95%×$950.10=$90.3450

At the end of January, the value of index was 89.25 hence the option writer’s payout

Writer's payout=Value of index in the beginning-Value of index in end=$90.3450-$89.25=$1.0950

Hence the average gross monthly payout = 0.2437 and the standard deviation = 1.0951

02

 Step 3: Calculation of average payout and standard deviation ‘b’

In October 1987, the S&P decreased by more than 21% from 321. 83 to 251.79

The exercise price of the put written at the beginning of October 1987:

Exercise price of put=Exercise price×Value of index=95%×$321.83=$305.7385

The payout of the option’s writer at the end of October:

Writer's payout=Value of index in the beginning-Value of index in end=$305.7385-$251.79=$53.9485

The average gross monthly payout from October 1977 to October 1987 = 0.6875 and the standard deviation = 5.0026

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the following information to answer Problems l2–16:

Primo Management Co. islooking at how best to evaluate the performance of its managers. Primo has been hearingmore and more about benchmark portfolios and is interested in trying this approach. Assuch, the company hired Sally Jones, CFA, as a consultant to educate the managers on the

best methods for constructing a benchmark portfolio, how best to choose a benchmark,whether the style of the fund under management matters, and what they should do withtheir global funds in terms of benchmarking.

For the sake of discussion, Jones put together some comparative two-year performancenumbers that relate to Primo’s current domestic funds under management and apotential benchmark.

As part of her analysis, Jones also takes a look at one of Primo’s global funds. In thisparticular portfolio, Primo is invested 75% in Dutch stocks and 25% in British stocks.

The benchmark invested 50% in each—Dutch and British stocks. On average, the Britishstocks outperformed the Dutch stocks. The euro appreciated 6% versus the U.S. dollarover the holding period, while the pound depreciated 2% versus the dollar. In terms of thelocal return, Primo outperformed the benchmark with the Dutch investments but underperformedthe index with respect to the British stocks.

Question: Which of the following statements about Primo’s global fund is most correct?

Primoappears to have a positive currency allocation effect as well as:

a. A negative market allocation effect and a positive security allocation effect.

b. A negative market allocation effect and a negative security allocation effect.

c. A positive market allocation effect and a negative security allocation effect.

What savings rate from real income (Spreadsheet 21.3) will produce the same retirementannuity as a 15% savings rate from nominal income?

Is statistical arbitrage true arbitrage? Explain.

In addition to expected longevity, what traits might affect an individual’s demand for alife annuity?

The chairman provides you with the following data, covering one year, concerning the portfolios of two of the fund’s equity managers (manager A and manager B). Although the portfolios consist primarily of common stocks, cash reserves are included in the calculation of both portfolio betas and performance. By way of perspective, selected data for the financial markets are included in the following table.

a. Calculate and compare the alpha of the two managers relative to each other and to the S&P 500.

b. Explain two reasons the conclusions drawn from this calculation may be misleading.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free