Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Renée Michaels, CFA, plans to invest $1 million in U.S. government cash equivalents for the next 90 days. Michaels’s client has authorized her to use non-U.S. government cash equivalents, but only if the currency risk is hedged to U.S. dollars by using forward currency contracts.

a. Calculate the U.S.-dollar value of the hedged investment at the end of 90 days for each of the two cash equivalents in the table below. Show all calculations.

b. Briefly explain the theory that best accounts for your results.

c. Based upon this theory, estimate the implied interest rate for a 90-day U.S. government cash equivalent.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Dollar interest rate is 1.5793% which is equal to that of Yen investment

b. Interest rate parity relationship

c. Between 6.2572% to 6.3172%

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of dollar proceeds from 90 days Japanese yen

Interest rate = 7.6%

Investment = $1 million

Time = 90 days or ¼

Exchange rates = 133.05

The yen investment after exchange = $1 million x 133.05 =¥133.05 million

The yen investment after 90-day forward =¥133.05 million x[1 + (.076 / 4)]=¥135. 57795 million

Since interests are typically annualized for 360 days, for 90 days it will be divided by 4.

Selling this at the forward exchange rate of ¥133.47 = ¥135. 57795 million / ¥133.47 = $1.015793 million

Hence 90 days dollar interest rate = 1.5793%

02

Calculation of dollar proceeds from 90 days Swiss franc

Interest rate = 8.6%

Investment = $1 million

Time = 90 days or ¼

Exchange rates = 1.526

Hence, as above calculation, Dollar proceeds from 90 days Swiss franc

= (1 million x 1.526) x (1 + .086 / 4) / 1.5348

= $1.015643 million

This implies that the dollar interest rate is 1.5643%.

This means that it the same as of the yen investment.

03

Explanation of theory

The identical results in both these currencies reflect the interest rate parity relationship. This therefore asserts that the pricing relationship between interest rates, spot and forward exchange rates must make covered investments in any currency equally attractive.

04

Calculation of implied interest rates

Since the dollar return on default free government securities in Japan and Switzerland is 1.5793% and 1.5643% respectively. Hence the 90 days interest rate must lie between these two.

This would correspond to an annual rate between 6.2572% and 6.3172% which is less than APR in Japan or Switzerland.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A fund manages a \(1.2 billion equity portfolio with a beta of .6. If the S&P contract multiplier is \)250 and the index is currently at 800, how many contracts should the fund sell to make its overall position market neutral?

a. Suppose the spot price of the British pound is currently $1.50. If the risk-free interest rate on one-year government bonds is 4% in the United States and 3% in the United Kingdom, what must the forward price of the pound be for delivery one year from now?

b. How could an investor make risk-free arbitrage profits if the forward price were higher than the price you gave in answer to ( a )? Give a numerical example.

Which of the following would be the most appropriate benchmark to use for hedge fund evaluation?

a. A multifactor model.

b. The S&P 500.

c. The risk-free rate.

The aspect least likely to be included in the portfolio management process is:

a. Identifying an investor’s objectives, constraints, and preferences.

b. Organizing the management process itself.

c. Implementing strategies regarding the choice of assets to be used.

d. Monitoring market conditions, relative values, and investor circumstances

Here are data on three hedge funds. Each fund charges its investors an incentive fee of 20% of total returns. Suppose initially that a fund of funds (FF) manager buys equal amounts of each of these funds and also charges its investors a 20% incentive fee. For simplicity, assume also that management fees other than incentive fees are zero for all funds.

a. Compute the rate of return after incentive fees to an investor in the fund of funds.

b. Suppose that instead of buying shares in each of the three hedge funds, a stand-alone (SA) hedge fund purchases the same portfolio as the three underlying funds. The total value and composition of the SA fund is therefore identical to the one that would result from aggregating the three hedge funds. Consider an investor in the SA fund.

After paying 20% incentive fees, what would be the value of the investor’s portfolio at the end of the year?

c. Confirm that the investor’s rate of return in SA is higher than in FF by an amount equal to the extra layer of fees charged by the fund of funds.

d. Now suppose that the return on the portfolio held by hedge fund 3 were 2 30% rather than 1 30%. Recalculate your answers to parts ( a ) and ( b ). Will either FF or SA charge an incentive fee in this scenario? Why then does the investor in FF still do worse than the investor in SA?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free