Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Return to the previous problem, as below.

a. Suppose you hold an equally weighted portfolio of 100 stocks with the same alpha, beta, and residual standard deviation as Waterworks. Assume the residual returns (the e terms in Equations 20.1 and 20.2) on each of these stocks are independent of each other. What is the residual standard deviation of the portfolio?

b. Recalculate the probability of a loss on a market-neutral strategy involving equally weighted, market-hedged positions in the 100 stocks over the next month.

Question: The following is part of the computer output from a regression of monthly returns on Waterworks stock against the S&P 500 Index. A hedge fund manager believes that Waterworks is underpriced, with an alpha of 2% over the coming month.

a. If he holds a \(3 million portfolio of Waterworks stock and wishes to hedge market exposure for the next month using one-month maturity S&P 500 futures contracts, how many contracts should he enter? Should he buy or sell contracts? The S&P 500 currently is at 1,000 and the contract multiplier is \)250.

b. What is the standard deviation of the monthly return of the hedged portfolio?

c. Assuming that monthly returns are approximately normally distributed, what is the probability that this market-neutral strategy will lose money over the next month?

Assume the risk-free rate is .5% per month.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. 6%

b. Unlikely

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of residual standard deviation of the portfolio ‘a’

Since the residual standard deviation is smaller than each stock’s SD by a factor =10. Hence instead of a standard residual SD of 6%, residual standard deviation is now .6%

02

Calculation of the probability of loss ‘c’

Since ERR of market neutral position = the risk free rate + Alpha

= .005 + .02 =.025

= 2.5%

The z value for a rate of return of zero = X -μ/σ

= 0 – 0.25 / .06

= -.4167

Therefore the probability of a negative return = N(-.4167) = 1.55 x 10-5

This implies that negative return is unlikely.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two portfolio managers use different procedures to estimate alpha. One uses a single index model regression, the other the Fama-French model. Other things equal, would you prefer the portfolio with the larger alpha based on the index model or the FF model?

The same ship owner advertises a tariff whereby the freight charged for all cargo will be the same. What kind of good can the ship owner expect to attract?

If you were to invest $10,000 in the British bills of Problem 9, how would you lock in the dollar-denominated return?

Go to www.mhhe.com/bkm and link to the material for Chapter 18, where you will find five years of monthly returns for two mutual funds, Vanguard’s U.S. Growth Fund and U.S. Value Fund, as well as corresponding returns for the S&P 500 and the Treasury-bill rate.

a. Set up a spreadsheet to calculate each fund’s excess rate of return over T-bills in each month.

b. Calculate the standard deviation of each fund over the five-year period.

c. What was the beta of each fund over the five-year period? (You may wish to review the spreadsheets from Chapters 5 and 6 on the Index model.)

d. What were the Sharpe, Jensen, and Treynor measures for each fund?

Here are data on three hedge funds. Each fund charges its investors an incentive fee of 20% of total returns. Suppose initially that a fund of funds (FF) manager buys equal amounts of each of these funds and also charges its investors a 20% incentive fee. For simplicity, assume also that management fees other than incentive fees are zero for all funds.

a. Compute the rate of return after incentive fees to an investor in the fund of funds.

b. Suppose that instead of buying shares in each of the three hedge funds, a stand-alone (SA) hedge fund purchases the same portfolio as the three underlying funds. The total value and composition of the SA fund is therefore identical to the one that would result from aggregating the three hedge funds. Consider an investor in the SA fund.

After paying 20% incentive fees, what would be the value of the investor’s portfolio at the end of the year?

c. Confirm that the investor’s rate of return in SA is higher than in FF by an amount equal to the extra layer of fees charged by the fund of funds.

d. Now suppose that the return on the portfolio held by hedge fund 3 were 2 30% rather than 1 30%. Recalculate your answers to parts ( a ) and ( b ). Will either FF or SA charge an incentive fee in this scenario? Why then does the investor in FF still do worse than the investor in SA?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free