Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use the following information to answer Problems l2–16:

Primo Management Co. is looking at how best to evaluate the performance of its managers. Primo has been hearing more and more about benchmark portfolios and is interested in trying this approach. As such, the company hired Sally Jones, CFA, as a consultant to educate the managers on thebest methods for constructing a benchmark portfolio, how best to choose a benchmark, whether the style of the fund under management matters, and what they should do with their global funds in terms of benchmarking.

For the sake of discussion, Jones put together some comparative two-year performance numbers that relate to Primo’s current domestic funds under management and a potential benchmark.

As part of her analysis, Jones also takes a look at one of Primo’s global funds. In this particular portfolio, Primo is invested 75% in Dutch stocks and 25% in British stocks.

The benchmark invested 50% in each—Dutch and British stocks. On average, the British stocks outperformed the Dutch stocks. The euro appreciated 6% versus the U.S. dollar over the holding period, while the pound depreciated 2% versus the dollar. In terms of the local return, Primo outperformed the benchmark with the Dutch investments but underperformed the index with respect to the British stocks.

Question: Calculate the amount by which the Primo portfolio out- (or under-) performed the market over the period, as well as the contribution to performance of the pure sector allocation and security selection decisions.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Primo underperformed the benchmark.

Primo’s pure sector allocation decision = -2.2 %

Primo’s pure security selection decision = 0.8%

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of Primo portfolio performance

Primo return = Primo weight x Primo return

=.06 x 17% + 0.15 x 24% + 0.25 x 25%

= 18.8%

Benchmark return = Bench mark weight x bench mark return

= 0.5 x 16% + 0.4 x 26% + 0.1 x 18%

= 20.2%

Performance calculation: Primo – Bench mark

= 18.8% - 20.2 %

= -1.4%

This implies that Primo underperformed the benchmark.

02

Calculation of Primo’s pure sector allocation decision

This can be calculated by multiplying the weight difference between Primo and benchmark portfolio in each sector by the benchmark sector returns:

Hence; (0.6 - 0.5) x (.16) + (0.15 – 0.4) x (.26) + (0.25 – 0.1) x (.18)

= -2.2 %

03

Calculation of Primo’s pure security selection decision

This can be calculated by multiplying the return differences between Primo and benchmark for each sector by Primo’s weightings:

Hence: (.17 - .16) x (.6) + (.24 - .26) x (.15) + (.2 – 0.18) x (.25)

= 0.8%

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Under the flat tax (Spreadsheet 21.4), will a 1% increase in ROR offset a 1% increase in the tax rate?

Consider the following information regarding the performance of a money manager in a recent month. The table presents the actual return of each sector of the manager’s portfolio in column (1), the fraction of the portfolio allocated to each sector in column (2), the benchmark or neutral sector allocations in column (3), and the returns of sector indexes in column (4).

a. What was the manager’s return in the month? What was her over- or under - performance?

b. What was the contribution of security selection to relative performance?

c. What was the contribution of asset allocation to relative performance? Confirm that the sum of selection and allocation contributions equals her total “excess” return relative to the bogey.

Suppose a hedge fund follows the following strategy: Each month it holds \(100 million of an S&P 500 Index fund and writes out-of-the-money put options on \)100 million of the index with exercise price 5% lower than the current value of the index. Suppose the premium it receives for writing each put is $.25 million, roughly in line with the actual value of the puts.

a. Calculate the Sharpe ratio the fund would have realized in the period October 1982–September 1987. Compare its Sharpe ratio to that of the S&P 500. Use the data from the previous problem available at the Online Learning Center, and assume the monthly risk-free interest rate over this period was .7%.

b. Now calculate the Sharpe ratio the fund would have realized if we extend the sample period by one month to include October 1987. What do you conclude about performance evaluation and tail risk for funds pursuing option like strategies?

Now suppose the investor in Problem 5 also sells forward £5,000 at a forward exchange rate of $2.10/£.

a. Recalculate the dollar-denominated returns for each scenario.

b. What happens to the standard deviation of the dollar-denominated return? Compare it to both its old value and the standard deviation of the pound-denominated return.

A hedge fund charges an incentive fee of 20% of any investment returns above the T-bill rate, which currently is 2%. In the first year, the fund suffers a loss of 8%. What rate of return must it earn in the second year to be eligible for an incentive fee?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free