Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a study of the nutritional requirements of cattle, researchers measured the weight gains of cows during a 78 -day period. For two breeds of cows, Hereford (HH) and Brown Swiss/Hereford (SH), the results are summarized in the following table. \({ }^{6}\) $$ \begin{array}{|lll|} \hline & \text { HH } & \text { SH } \\ \hline n & 33 & 51 \\ \bar{y} & 18.3 & 13.9 \\ s & 17.8 & 19.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) What is the value of the \(t\) test statistic for comparing the means? (b) In the context of this study, state the null and alternative hypotheses. (c) The \(P\) -value for the \(t\) test is \(0.29 .\) If \(\alpha=0.10\), what is your conclusion regarding the hypotheses in (b)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The value of the t-test statistic is found using the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes given. If the P-value (0.29) is greater than the significance level (0.10), the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the data

Review and understand the given information. In this case, for each breed (HH and SH), we have the number of cows (\(n\)), the mean weight gain (\bar{y}\
02

Calculate the standard error of the difference in means

The standard error of the difference in means is found using the formula: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{s_{HH}^2}{n_{HH}} + \frac{s_{SH}^2}{n_{SH}}}\). Substitute the given standard deviations and sample sizes for each cow breed and calculate the value of SE.
03

Calculate the t test statistic

Use the formula \(\(t = \frac{\bar{y}_{HH} - \bar{y}_{SH}}{SE}\)\) to calculate the value of the t-test statistic by substituting the mean weight gains and the standard error calculated in Step 2.
04

State the null and alternative hypotheses

Write down the null hypothesis (\(H_0\) which posits no difference in means between the two populations) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_A\) which suggests there is a significant difference).
05

Make a decision regarding the hypotheses

Compare the P-value to the significance level \(\alpha=0.10\) to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. If P-value > \alpha, do not reject the null; if P-value < \alpha, reject the null.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
When we perform a statistical test, our starting point is a set of hypotheses. In a t-test, just like in the given exercise where researchers measure weight gains in cows, we begin by stating the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)), which is a statement of no effect or no difference. In this scenario, our null hypothesis would be that there is no significant difference in the mean weight gain between Hereford cows (HH) and Brown Swiss/Hereford cows (SH). Mathematically, we'd say \(H_0: \bar{y}_{HH} = \bar{y}_{SH}\).
The alternative hypothesis (\(H_A\)), on the other hand, is what we're trying to provide evidence for — it's the opposite of the null. In the exercise, the alternative hypothesis asserts that there is a significant difference in the weight gains of the two breeds, which we express as \(H_A: \bar{y}_{HH} eq \bar{y}_{SH}\).
Understanding these hypotheses is crucial because they guide the direction of the statistical testing and influence the interpretation of the results. The null hypothesis is like a courtroom's presumption of innocence; the data collected needs to provide enough evidence to 'convict', or in this case, to reject the null hypothesis.
P-value Interpretation
A P-value is a probability that measures the evidence against the null hypothesis. Lower P-values indicate stronger evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis. In the context of our cow weight gain study, the P-value is 0.29. To interpret this, compare it with the significance level, commonly denoted as \(\alpha\). The significance level represents the risk we are willing to take of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis (a type I error).
Here, if our significance level \(\alpha = 0.10\), it means we accept a 10% chance of making a type I error. Since 0.29 is greater than 0.10, we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Hence, we would conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to say that the mean weight gain for the two cow breeds is significantly different; in the judicial metaphor, the null hypothesis cannot be convicted with the available evidence.
Standard Error Calculation
The standard error (SE) is a measure of how much we expect our sample mean to vary from the true population mean. A smaller SE indicates more precision of the sample mean as an estimator of the population mean. The calculation for SE is dependent on the distribution of our data and in the case of our exercise, we calculate it when comparing two means.
Using the formula provided in the step by step solution,\[SE = \sqrt{\frac{{s_{HH}^2}}{{n_{HH}}} + \frac{{s_{SH}^2}}{{n_{SH}}}}\],we replace the sample variances \(s_{HH}^2\) and \(s_{SH}^2\) and the respective sample sizes of Hereford cows (HH) and Brown Swiss/Hereford (SH). By computing the SE, we're quantifying the likelihood of observing the sample means if the null hypothesis were true. It's a crucial step in determining the t-test statistic which informs us if the observed difference in means is significant beyond random chance given the observed variability in our data.
Improvement Advice: To provide additional clarity, examples using actual numbers can be helpful for visual learners. For instance, if \(s_{HH}^2 = 17.8\) and \(s_{SH}^2 = 19.1\) with respective sample sizes of 33 and 51, we would plug those into our formula and calculate a precise SE value. This calculated SE would then be used in subsequent calculations for the t-test statistic.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Patients with nonchronic low back pain were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received health coaching via telephone plus physiotherapy care or a control group that received only the physiotherapy care. One variable measured was improvement, over 4 weeks, in "modified Oswestry Disability Index," which is scored as a percentage, ranging from 0 to 100 , with high scores representing high levels of disability. Summary statistics are shown in the table. \({ }^{54}\) $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline & \text { Experimental } & \text { Control } \\ \hline \text { Mean } & 16.8 & 11.9 \\ \text { SD } & 18.7 & 11.6 \\ n & 12 & 14 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Calculate the sample effect size from these data. (b) A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in population mean Oswestry Disability Index for the two groups \(\left(\mu_{\text {Experimental }}-\mu_{\text {Control }}\right)\) is (-8.2,18.0) percentage points. The researchers were hoping to find a difference of at least 5 percentage points, a difference that they thought would be clinically important. Based on the confidence interval, would they be ill-advised to conduct a larger study in the hope of finding convincing evidence of a 5 percentage point difference? (c) How would your answer to (b) change if the confidence interval was (-2.4,3.2) percentage points.

Suppose we have conducted a \(t\) test, with \(\alpha=0.10\), and the \(P\) -value is \(0.07 .\) For each of the following statements, say whether the statement is true or false and explain why. (a) We reject \(H_{0}\) with \(\alpha=0.10\). (b) We have significant evidence for \(I I_{A}\) with \(\alpha=0.10\). (c) We would reject \(H_{0}\) if \(\alpha\) were \(0.05 .\) (d) We do not have significant evidence for \(H_{A}\) with \(\alpha=0.05\). (e) The probability that \(\bar{Y}_{1}\) is greater than \(\bar{Y}_{2}\) is \(0.07 .\)

Research has shown that for mammals giving birth to a son versus a daughter places a greater strain on mothers. Does this affect the health of their next child? A study compared the birth-weights of humans born after a male versus after a female. Summary statistics for the sample of size 76 are given in the following table; the data were normally distributed. \({ }^{40}\) Consider a \(t\) test, with a directional alternative, to investigate the research hypothesis that birth weight is lower when the elder sib ling is male. (a) Write the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis in symbols. (b) Here is computer output for the \(t\) test. Explain what the \(P\) -value means in the context of this study. $$ \mathrm{t}=-2.145, \mathrm{df}=69.54, \mathrm{p}-\mathrm{va} 7 \mathrm{ue}=0.0177 $$ alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is less than 0 (c) If \(\alpha=0.05,\) what is your conclusion regarding \(H_{0} ?\)

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a form of gastrointestinal dysfunction that commonly occurs after abdominal surgery and results in absent or delayed gastrointestinal motility. Does rocking in a chair after abdominal surgery reduce postoperative ileus (POI) duration? Sixty-six postoperative abdominal surgery patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group \((n=34)\) received standard care plus the use of a rocking chair while the control group \((n=32)\) received only standard care. For each patient, the postoperative time until first flatus (days) (an indication that the POI has ended) was measured. The results are tabulated below. \(^{43}\) Here is computer output for a \(t\) test. \(\mathrm{t}=-3.524, \mathrm{df}=63.99, \mathrm{p}\) -value \(=0.000396\) alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is less than 0 (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses in context. (b) Is there evidence at the level of \(\alpha=0.05\) that use of the rocking chair reduces POI duration (i.e., the time until first flatus)? (c) Although the researchers hypothesized that the use of a rocking chair could reduce POI duration, it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that the use of a rocking chair could increase POI duration. Based on this possibility, discuss the appropriateness of using a directional versus nondirectional test. (Hint: Consider what medical recommendations might be made based on this research.)

Suppose that a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) is calculated to be (-7.4,-2.3) . If we test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) versus \(H_{A}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2}\) using \(\alpha=0.10,\) will we reject \(H_{0} ?\) Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free