Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For each of the following situations, suppose H0:μ1=μ2 is being tested against HA:μ1>μ2. State whether or not there is significant evidence for HA. (a) ts=3.75 with 19 degrees of freedom, α=0.01. (b) ts=2.6 with 5 degrees of freedom, α=0.10. (c) ts=2.1 with 7 degrees of freedom, α=0.05. (d) tc=1.8 with 7 degrees of freedom, α=0.05.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For each scenario, significant evidence for HA: (a) yes, if tc<3.75; (b) yes, if tc<2.6; (c) yes, if tc<2.1; (d) yes, if tc<1.8. The conclusions depend on comparing ts with the critical t value from the t-distribution for the given degrees of freedom and alpha level.

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding the Hypothesis Test

We are given a set of hypothesis tests for different scenarios. Each test is for comparing two population means to see if there is significant evidence to support the alternative hypothesis, HA:μ1>μ2, over the null hypothesis, H0:μ1=μ2. We are given a test statistic, ts, degrees of freedom, and a significance level, α, for each scenario. We will compare the test statistic to the critical value from the t-distribution to determine whether to reject H0.
02

- Scenario (a) Analysis

For scenario (a), we have ts=3.75, 19 degrees of freedom, and α=0.01. We'll use a t-table or software to find the critical value, tc, for 19 dfs at the 0.01 level of significance for a one-tailed test. If ts>tc, there is significant evidence to reject H0.
03

- Scenario (b) Analysis

For scenario (b), we have ts=2.6, 5 degrees of freedom, and α=0.10. We find the critical value, tc, for 5 dfs at the 0.10 level of significance. If ts>tc, it provides significant evidence against H0.
04

- Scenario (c) Analysis

For scenario (c), we have ts=2.1, 7 degrees of freedom, and α=0.05. Similar to previous steps, we find tc for 7 dfs at the 0.05 significance level. If ts>tc, H0 is rejected.
05

- Scenario (d) Analysis

For scenario (d), the provided statistic is labeled tc instead of ts. Assuming this is a typo and should be ts=1.8, with 7 dfs and α=0.05, we again find the appropriate critical value. If ts>tc, then we reject H0.
06

- Conclusion for Each Scenario

We use a t-distribution table or software to find the critical values for each scenario and compare the calculated ts to tc to decide about H0. (a) If the critical value is <3.75, H0 is rejected. (b) If the critical value is <2.6, H0 is rejected. (c) If the critical value is <2.1, H0 is rejected. (d) Assuming ts=1.8, if the critical value is <1.8, H0 is rejected. Each conclusion is based on whether ts is greater than the corresponding critical value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

T-Test
A t-test is a statistical method used to compare the means of two groups to determine if they significantly differ from each other. It's especially useful when dealing with small sample sizes and when the population standard deviation is unknown. In hypothesis testing, the t-test evaluates whether the difference in the sample means is likely due to chance or if it reflects a true difference in the population means.

Depending on the nature of the hypothesis, t-tests can be one-tailed or two-tailed. A one-tailed t-test, as in our exercise's scenarios, assesses the direction of the effect (whether one mean is greater than the other). It's crucial to align the type of t-test with the research question to properly interpret the results.
Degrees of Freedom
In statistics, degrees of freedom (df) represent the number of independent values in a calculation that can vary. When dealing with the t-test, the degrees of freedom are typically the number of observations minus the number of parameters needing to be estimated (in the case of a two-sample t-test, it's the combined sample sizes minus two).

Degrees of freedom play a crucial role in determining the critical value of the test statistic. The critical value is calculated based on the desired significance level and the df, so accurate calculation of df is essential for determining the right critical threshold for making a decision about the hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as α, is a threshold that indicates the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's actually true, otherwise known as a Type I error. Common α levels are 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1. It's a benchmark for determining the boundary of a rejection region for the test statistic.

The lower the α, the stronger the evidence must be to reject the null hypothesis. In a t-test, if the calculated test statistic exceeds the critical value associated with the chosen significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected. This threshold helps control the rate at which researchers erroneously find 'significant' results purely by chance.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (HA or H1) represents what a researcher is trying to prove or detect, and in practical terms, it suggests a difference or effect. In our exercise, the alternative hypothesis is μ1>μ2, indicating that the mean of the first group is greater than the mean of the second group.

The alternative hypothesis is tested against the null hypothesis. A significant result from a t-test lends support to the alternative hypothesis by demonstrating that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis (H0) is a statement of no effect, no difference, or no change. It's a starting point for statistical testing serving as a straw man to be debunked. In the exercise scenarios, H0:μ1=μ2 suggests that there is no difference between the group means.

During a t-test, evidence from the data is used to assess whether or not to reject the null hypothesis. If enough evidence exists (a large enough t-test statistic compared to the critical value), we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
Test Statistic
The test statistic, in the context of the t-test, is a standard score that measures the degree to which the sample data diverge from the null hypothesis. It's calculated from the sample data and is used in comparison to the critical value.

A larger absolute value of the test statistic indicates more substantial evidence against the null hypothesis. For example, in scenario (a) of our exercise, a t-test statistic (ts) of 3.75 suggests that the sample mean difference is quite far from what we would expect if the null hypothesis were true, considering there are 19 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.01.
Critical Value
The critical value determines the cutoff point at which we reject the null hypothesis. It is dependent upon the chosen significance level (α) and the degrees of freedom associated with the t-test. You can find critical values using statistical tables or computational tools.

In the exercise, the test statistic for each case must be greater than the critical value to provide significant evidence against the null hypothesis. For instance, with 19 degrees of freedom and an α level of 0.01, if the observed t-test statistic is greater than the corresponding critical value from a t-distribution table, then the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Ecological researchers measured the concentration of red cells in the blood of 27 field-caught lizards (Sceloporus occidetitalis). In addition, they examined each lizard for infection by the malarial parasite Plasmodium. The red cell counts (103× cells per mm3) were as reported in the table. 37  Infected  animals  Noninfected  animals n1215y¯972.1843.4s245.1251.2 One might expect that malaria would reduce the red cell count, and in fact previous research with another lizard species had shown such an effect. Do the data support this expectation? Assume that the data are normally distributed. Test the null hypothesis of no difference against the alternative that the infected population has a lower red cell count. Use a t test at (a) α=0.05 (b) α=0.10 [Note: Formula (6.7.1) yields 24 df.]

In a study of 1,040 subjects, researchers found that the prevalence of coronary heart disease increased as the number of cups of coffee consumed per day increased. 31 (a) What is the explanatory variable? (b) What is the response variable? (c) What are the observational units?

Patients with heart disease were randomly assigned to receive either treatment A or treatment B. At the end of the experiment it was found that systolic volume (a measure of health) "did not differ between groups (P -value =0.77)."18 Choose one of the following and explain your choice: (i) a Type I error might have been made. (ii) a Type II error might have been made.

An entomologist conducted an experiment to see if wounding a tomato plant would induce changes that improve its defense against insect attack. She grew larvae of the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) on wounded plants or control plants. The accompanying table shows the weights (mg) of the larvae after 7 days of growth. 41 (Assume that the data are normally distributed.) How strongly do the data support the researcher's expectation? Use a t test at the 5% significance level. Let HA be that wounding the plant tends to diminish larval growth. [Note: Formula (6.7.1) yields 31.8 df.]  Wounded  Control n1618y¯28.6637.96s9.0211.14

For an early study of the relationship between diet and heart disease, the investigator obtained data on heart disease mortality in various countries and on national average dietary compositions in the same countries. The accompanying graph shows, for six countries, the 19481949 death rate from degenerative heart disease (among men ages 55-59 years) plotted against the amount of fat in the diet. 32 In what ways might this graph be misleading? Which extraneous variables might be relevant here? Discuss.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free