Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an experiment to treat patients with "generalized anxiety disorder," the drug hydroxyzine was given to 71 patients, and 30 of them improved. A group of 70 patients were given a placebo, and 20 of them improved. \(^{51}\) Let \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) represent the probabilities of improvement using hydroxyzine and the placebo, respectively. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval for \(p_1 - p_2\) is \(\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2 \pm 1.96 \cdot SE\), where \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the sample proportions

First, we calculate the sample proportions for both groups. For the hydroxyzine group, the sample proportion of improvement is \(p_1 = \frac{\text{number of improvements with hydroxyzine}}{\text{total number of patients given hydroxyzine}} = \frac{30}{71}\). Similarly, for the placebo group, \(p_2 = \frac{\text{number of improvements with placebo}}{\text{total number of patients given placebo}} = \frac{20}{70}\).
02

Calculate the standard error (SE)

The standard error of the difference in proportions is calculated by using the formula: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}}\), where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes for both groups.
03

Find the z-value for the 95% confidence level

To construct a 95% confidence interval, we need to find the z-value corresponding to the middle 95% of the data. Found from a standard normal distribution table or calculator, the z-value that leaves 2.5% in each tail is approximately 1.96.
04

Construct the confidence interval

The confidence interval for \(p_1 - p_2\) can be constructed with the formula \(\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2 \pm z\cdot SE\). Use the z-value obtained from Step 3 and the standard error calculated in Step 2 to find the confidence interval.
05

Calculate and interpret the interval

Finally, calculate the confidence interval by substituting the values into the formula. The resulting interval provides the range within which the true difference in treatment effect between hydroxyzine and placebo lies with 95% confidence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Treatment Study
When researching treatments for disorders such as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), scientists often conduct controlled studies to compare the effectiveness of different interventions. In this context, a common approach is to compare a therapeutic drug with a placebo. A well-designed study on GAD treatment may involve randomly assigning patients to receive either the experimental drug or the placebo, then tracking which patients exhibit signs of improvement. The goal is to determine the efficacy of the drug in treating symptoms relative to the placebo, providing insights into whether the observed effects are due to the medication or not. It's critical to have a large enough sample size and to follow proper protocols to reduce bias and increase the validity of the study's findings.

Sample Proportions Calculation
When working with experimental data, such as in the GAD treatment study, researchers calculate sample proportions to quantify outcomes. The sample proportion is the ratio of individuals in a sample who exhibit a particular trait—improvement from GAD symptoms in this case—divided by the total number of individuals in that sample. To calculate the sample proportion, use the formula:
\[\begin{equation}p = \frac{\text{number of individuals with the trait}}{\text{total number of individuals in the sample}}\end{equation}\]
For both the drug hydroxyzine and the placebo, these proportions help to determine how effective each treatment was within the sample studied. The resulting values are crucial for further statistical analysis, like the confidence interval we want to construct.
Standard Error of Difference in Proportions
In statistics, to compare the difference between two sample proportions, such as the effectiveness of two treatments, we compute the standard error of the difference in proportions. The standard error provides a measure of the variability or standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the difference between two proportions. This is calculated with the formula:
\[\begin{equation}SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}}\end{equation}\]
where \( p_1 \) and \( p_2 \) are the sample proportions of each group and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are their respective sample sizes. A smaller SE suggests a more precise estimate of the true difference in population proportions.
Z-value for Confidence Level
In constructing confidence intervals, the 'z-value' plays a critical role. It corresponds to the desired confidence level—in our case, 95%. The z-value tells us how many standard errors to extend from the point estimate to capture the central percentage of the normal distribution. It is sourced from the standard normal distribution (Z-distribution).

For a 95% confidence interval, the z-value approximately equals 1.96, which means that the interval extends 1.96 standard errors above and below the sample proportion difference. This z-value is selected to leave a 2.5% tail on each end of the distribution, encompassing the central 95% of the distribution.
Statistical Inference
Statistical inference involves using data from a sample to make conclusions about a larger population. The confidence interval is a core tool in this process. It's used to estimate the range within which a population parameter, based on sample statistics, is likely to lie. For instance, a 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions between two treatments indicates that if we were to take many samples and build intervals in the same way, we'd expect about 95% of those intervals to contain the true difference in population proportions.

In the context of the GAD treatment study, we infer from our constructed interval the likely difference in the effectiveness of hydroxyzine versus a placebo. It's a powerful method that encapsulates both the estimate of the difference and the uncertainty associated with it.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Children with juvenile arthritis were randomly assigned to receive the drug tocilizumab or a placebo for 12 weeks. In the tocilizumab group, 64 out of 75 patients showed marked improvement versus 9 out of 37 for the placebo group. \(^{52}\) An appropriate \(95 \%\) confidence interval is (0.43,0.75) . Write a sentence that interprets this confidence interval, in context. Use cause- effect language if appropriate or say why no causal statement can be made.

An experiment involving subjects with schizophrenia compared "personal therapy" to "family therapy." Only 2 out of 23 subjects assigned to the personal therapy group suffered psychotic relapses in the first year of the study, compared to 8 of the 24 subjects assigned to the family therapy group. \(^{29}\) Is this sufficient evidence to conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the two types of therapies are not equally effective? Conduct Fisher's exact test using a nondirectional alternative.

The two claws of the lobster (Homarus americanus) are identical in the juvenile stages. By adulthood, however, the two claws normally have differentiated into a stout claw called a "crusher" and a slender claw called a "cutter." In a study of the differentiation process, 26 juvenile lobsters were reared in smooth plastic trays and 18 were reared in trays containing oyster chips (which they could use to exercise their claws). Another 23 lobsters were reared in trays containing only one oyster chip. The claw configurations of all the lobsters as adults are summarized in the table. \({ }^{35}\) $$ \begin{array}{|lccc|} \hline && {\text { Claw configuration }} \\ \hline\text { Treatment } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Right } \\ \text { crusher, } \\ \text { Left } \\ \text { cutter } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Right } \\ \text { cutter, } \\ \text { Left } \\ \text { crusher } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Right } \\ \text { cutter, } \\ \text { Left } \\ \text { cutter } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Oyster chips } & 8 & 9 & 1 \\ \text { Smooth plastic } & 2 & 4 & 20 \\ \text { One oyster chip } & 7 & 9 & 7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) The value of the contingency-table chi-square statistic for these data is \(\chi_{s}^{2}=24.35 .\) Carry out the chi-square test at \(\alpha=0.01\) (b) Verify the value of \(\chi_{s}^{2}\) given in part (a). (c) Construct a table showing the percentage distribution of claw configurations for each of the three treatments. (d) Interpret the table from part (c): In what way is claw configuration related to treatment? (For example, if you wanted a lobster with two cutter claws, which treatment would you choose and why?)

Consider a study to investigate a certain suspected disease-causing agent. One thousand people are to be chosen at random from the population; each individual is to be classified as diseased or not diseased and as exposed or not exposed to the agent. The results are to be cast in the following contingency table: Let EY and EN denote exposure and nonexposure and let DY and DN denote presence and absence of the disease. Express each of the following statements in terms of conditional probabilities. (Note that "a majority" means "more than half.") (a) The disease is more common among exposed than among nonexposed people. (b) Exposure is more common among diseased people than among nondiseased people. (c) Exposure is more common among diseased people than is nonexposure. (d) A majority of diseased people are exposed. (e) A majority of exposed people are diseased. (f) Exposed people are more likely to be diseased than are nonexposed people. (g) Exposed people are more likely to be diseased than to be nondiseased

Do women respond to men's solicitations more readily during the fertile phase of their menstrual cycles? In a study of this question, each of two hundred 18 - to 25-year-old women who were walking alone in a city were approached by an attractive 20-year-old man who solicited the woman's telephone number. Previous research suggested that during the fertile phase of her menstrual cycle a woman would be more receptive to this kind of request than at other times. Of 60 women who were in the fertile phase of their cycles, 13 gave out their phone numbers and 47 refused. The corresponding numbers for the 140 women not in the fertile phase of their cycles were 11 and \(129 .^{14}\) The data are summarized in the following table. Consider a chi-square test to determine whether the difference in success rates provides significant evidence in favor of an appropriate directional alternative. Here is computer output for a chi-square test that used a nondirectional alternative. $$ X \text { -squared }=7.585, d f=1, \text { p-value }=0.0059 $$ (a) State the null and appropriate directional alternative hypotheses in context. (b) Compute the sample proportions and the expected frequencies. (c) If \(\alpha=0.02\), what is your conclusion regarding \(H_{0}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free