Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the thermodynamic models of gene regulation discussed in the chapter, the RNA polymerase is treated as a single molecular species. While this might be a reasonable assumption for transcription in prokaryotes, in eukaryotes tens of different molecules need to come together in order to form the transcriptional machinery. The objective of this problem is to develop intuition about the requirements for our simple model to apply in such a complex case by assuming that the transcriptional machinery is made out of two different subunits, \(X\) and \(Y\), that come together at the promoter. (a) Calculate the probability of finding the complex \(X+Y\) bound to the promoter in the case where unit \(X\) binds to DNA and unit Y binds to X. Can you reduce this to an effective one-molecule problem such as in the bacterial case? (b) Calculate the fold-change in gene expression for simple repression using transcriptional machinery such as that proposed in (a). Explore the weak promoter assumption in order to reduce the expression to that corresponding to the bacterial case. Repeat this for the case where an activator can contact Y. (c) Repeat (a) and (b) for a case where \(Y\) binds to a site on the DNA that is near the X-binding site, and there is an interaction energy between \(X\) and \(Y\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In the eukaryotic case scenario, gene regulation can be reduced to an one-molecule effective problem similar to bacterial case. The fold-change in gene expression can be determined in both scenarios using the association constants and the weak promoter assumption. When an activator can contact \(Y\), this will affect the fold change. In scenario where \(Y\) binds near \(X\)-binding site, interaction energy should be incorporated in calculations.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of Probability of Binding

Assuming that the subunits \(X\) and \(Y\) bind sequentially, the concentration of the complex \(X+Y\) can be written as \( [X+Y] = [X][Y]K_xK_y \) where \( K_x \) and \( K_y \) are the association constants for \(X\) and \(Y\) binding. Thus, the probability \(P\) that the complex \(X+Y\) is bound to the promoter is \(P = [X+Y]K_p / (1 + [X+Y]K_p) \) where \( K_p \) is the promoter association constant. This can be rearranged to form an effective one-molecule problem (like a bacterial case) with an effective association constant \( K' = K_xK_yK_p \) and \( P = [X][Y]K' / (1 + [X][Y]K') \).
02

Calculate Fold Change in Expression

The fold-change in gene expression for simple repression can be defined as the ratio of gene expression with a repressor present to the gene expression without it. With the weak promoter assumption (which allows us to neglect the terms involving the promoter), the fold change can be reduced to that corresponding to the bacterial case. By calculating the expression levels in both scenarios, folding-change can be found. In case where an activator can contact \(Y\), the scenario will slightly change but similar calculations apply.
03

Analyzing a Different Binding Scenario

In the scenario where \(Y\) binds to a site on the DNA near the \(X\)-binding site, and there is an interaction energy \(E_{int}\) between \(X\) and \(Y\), the probability of \(X+Y\) binding and fold-change in expression should be recalculated. Here, the binding would be a competitive binding between \(X\) and all other possible interacting partners including \(Y\). In addition, interaction energy \(E_{int}\) between \(X\) and \(Y\) should be factored in the equations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Thermodynamic Models
Thermodynamic models provide a way to predict how biological molecules such as DNA, RNA, and proteins interact with each other within the cell. In the context of gene regulation, these models help us to understand how the binding of molecules to DNA can affect the rate at which genes are turned on or off.

Through these models, we apply the principles of energy landscapes and binding affinities to determine the probability that certain configurations—like a transcriptional machinery binding to a promoter—will occur. For instance, transcription factors can have different binding strengths to a DNA sequence, which can be quantified with association constants (\( K \)) in our equations.

This approach assumes a dynamic equilibrium, where binding and unbinding processes are continually occurring, and the probability of any given state can be illustrated by calculating the ratio of concentrations of bound and unbounded molecules. In the exercise given, a simplified model is applied to eukaryotic transcription, highlighting the complexity of multi-subunit assembly on promoter regions in contrast to the single molecular species assumption used for prokaryotic systems.
Transcriptional Machinery
The transcriptional machinery of a eukaryotic cell is substantially more complex than that of a prokaryotic cell. It includes a multitude of proteins and subunits that must come together to initiate transcription. This assembly is often referred to as the pre-initiation complex and facilitates the accurate and timely transcription of genes.

In prokaryotes, the RNA polymerase may directly bind to DNA and start the transcription process, whereas in eukaryotes, various transcription factors (subunits) must assemble in a coordinated fashion. For example, general transcription factors facilitate the binding of RNA polymerase to the DNA, and other coactivators might alter the structure of chromatin to enable transcription. As explained in the exercise, considering just two subunits (\( X \) and \( Y \)) is already a step towards capturing the complexity of eukaryotic gene regulation, by assuming a sequential binding to DNA.
Probability of Gene Expression
The probability of gene expression can be conceptualized as the likelihood that a gene will be transcribed to produce messenger RNA (mRNA) and then translated into a functional protein. This probability is influenced by various factors such as the presence of transcription factors, the strength of promoter sequences, and DNA accessibility.

To quantify this probability, we calculate the likelihood that transcriptional machinery will be properly assembled on the gene's promoter. In simple models, this might be represented as the fraction of time a promoter is occupied by RNA polymerase. In more complex scenarios, such as the one we face with eukaryotic transcription involving multiple subunits, calculations must account for the concentration of subunits and their interactions. The provided exercise uses thermodynamic principles to calculate the likelihood that the transcriptional complex \( X+Y \) forms and binds to the promoter region, which directly affects the gene's expression level.
Simple Repression
Simple repression is a form of gene regulation where a repressor protein binds to specific DNA sequences known as operator sites, which are generally found in the vicinity of the promoter region. By binding to these sites, repressors physically block RNA polymerase from transcribing the gene, thus reducing or completely inhibiting gene expression.

In the exercise, 'simple repression' is analyzed in the context of a two-subunit transcriptional machinery. The 'fold-change' in gene expression—calculated as the ratio of gene expression levels with and without a repressor—provides a measure of how effective the repression is. When applying the assumption of a weak promoter, one that has a low probability of RNA polymerase binding, the calculations can be simplified. This approximation allows us to reformulate complex eukaryotic systems to mirror simpler bacterial situations, thus extending the concept of simple repression to more elaborate models of transcriptional regulation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the last section of the chapter, we considered the action of N-WASP using a simple one-dimensional random walk model to treat the statistical mechanics of looping. Redo that analysis by using the Gaussian model of a polymer chain. First, assume that the loop has to close on itself and then account for the finite size of the protein domain. Compare your results with those obtained in the chapter.

In chemotaxis experiments, a source of nutrient molecules can be introduced into the medium containing bacteria via a micropipette. The outward diffusion of the nutrient molecules creates a position-dependent concentration gradient, and the chemotactic response of the bacteria can be observed under a microscope. (a) Estimate the nutrient gradient in steady state as a function of the distance from the micropipette \(r\) by assuming that it keeps the concentration fixed at \(c_{0}\) for distances \(r

In this problem, we work out an expression for the repression for the case in which there are \(N\) plasmids, each harboring the same promoter subjected to repression by the simple repression motif. (a) Write a partition function for \(P\) RNA polymerase molecules that can bind to the plasmids, resulting in expression of our gene of interest. Take into account the cell's nonspecific reservoir and assume that \(P \gg N\) Calculate the mean number of plasmids occupied by RNA polymerase, \(\langle N\rangle .\) Could you just have predicted this result based on what you know about the \(N=1\) case? (b) Work out an expression for the repression defined as $$\text { repression }=\frac{\langle N\rangle(R=0)}{\langle N\rangle(R \neq 0)}$$ Make sure to take into account the distinct cases where \(NR,\) where \(R\) is the number of repressors, and assume that you are dealing with a weak promoter, namely \(\left(P / N_{\mathrm{NS}}\right) \mathrm{e}^{-\beta \Delta \varepsilon_{\mathrm{pd}}} \ll 1\) (c) Show that your result yields the same expression for simple repression in the case where \(N=1\) that we found in the chapter. (d) Consider the case where there are two plasmids (that is, \(N=2)\) and work out the repression as a function of the number of repressors and make a corresponding plot.

For transcription to start, the RNA polymerase bound to the promoter needs to undergo a conformational change to the so-called open complex. The rate of open complex formation is often much smaller than the rates for the polymerase binding and falling off the promoter. Here, we investigate within a simple model how this state of affairs might justify the equilibrium assumption underlying thermodynamic models of gene regulation, namely that the equilibrium probability that the promoter is occupied by the RNA polymerase determines the level of gene expression. (a) Write down the chemical kinetics equation for this situation. Consider three states: RNA polymerase bound nonspecifically on the DNA (N); RNA polymerase bound to the promoter in the closed complex (C); and RNA polymerase bound to the promoter in the open complex (O). To simplify matters, take both the rate for \(\mathrm{N} \rightarrow \mathrm{C}\) and the rate for \(C \rightarrow N\) to be \(k\). Assume that the transition \(C \rightarrow O\) is irreversible, with rate \(\Gamma\) (b) For \(\Gamma=0,\) show that in the steady state there are equal numbers of RNA polymerases in the \(\mathrm{N}\) and \(\mathrm{C}\) states. What is the steady state in the case \(\Gamma \neq 0 ?\) (c) For the case \(\Gamma \neq 0\), show that for times \(1 / k \ll t \ll 1 / \Gamma\), the numbers of RNA polymerases in the \(\mathrm{N}\) and \(\mathrm{C}\) states are equal, as would be expected in equilibrium.

The model of the Poisson promoter considered in the chapter assumed that the number of copies of the gene of interest was fixed at one. However, as a result of the replication of the chromosomal DNA, during some part of the cell cycle there will be two (or even more for rapidly dividing cells) copies of the gene of interest. In this problem, we imagine that during a fraction \(f\) of the cell cycle, there is one copy of our gene of interest and during the rest of the cell cycle there are two such copies. (a) Write down the appropriate distribution \(p(m)\) for \(m\) mRNA molecules as a function of the parameter \(f\) (b) Find \(\langle m\rangle\) (c) Find \(\left\langle m^{2}\right\rangle\) and use it to find the Fano factor. (d) Plot the Fano factor as a function of \(f\) for different choices of the mean mRNA copy number for a single promoter. How "Poissonian" do you expect an unregulated promoter to be? (Problem courtesy of Rob Brewster and Daniel Jones.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free