Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the last section of the chapter, we considered the action of N-WASP using a simple one-dimensional random walk model to treat the statistical mechanics of looping. Redo that analysis by using the Gaussian model of a polymer chain. First, assume that the loop has to close on itself and then account for the finite size of the protein domain. Compare your results with those obtained in the chapter.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Using the Gaussian model for a polymer chain, we found that a loop is highly improbable for a completely free chain (Step 1). However, when we consider the finite size of the protein domain, loops can certainly form. Comparing our results with the simple one-dimensional random walk model, the Gaussian model is a more accurate representation as it accounts for excluded volume effects (Step 2).

Step by step solution

01

Gaussian model for a loop that has to close on itself

In this step, the Gaussian model will be applied to a polymer chain that forms a loop. In such a Gaussian loop, the total chain vector is 0 as the chain starts and ends at the same point. The mean square end-to-end distance R2 can be related to total chain length N and segment length b, given by the formula R2=Nb2. As the loop has to close on itself, R2=0. Thus, all N segments are at the same spot, corresponding to a highly improbable situation in a random walk. However, loops certainly can form, so the Gaussian chain model is accurate only for large N where the end-to-end distance is much greater than the segment length, which doesn't apply to our situation.
02

Adjusting for the finite size of the protein domain

Here, we account for the fact that the protein occupies a finite volume and thus restricts the number of configurations available to the chain. We can treat the protein as a sphere of radius a around the origin, reducing the space inside which our random walk can occur to a sphere of radius a. This modifies the calculation of accessible states. We have to work out the partition function for a chain of N steps inside a sphere of radius a, which requires integrating over all space and using the appropriate boundary conditions for the partition function.
03

Comparison with previous results

In this step, we compare our results from the Gaussian model with those obtained in the chapter using the simple one-dimensional random walk model. The one-dimensional model may overestimate the occurrence of looping, as it does not account for the excluded volume effect. The Gaussian model accounts for this, making it a more realistic model for polymer chains.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Mechanics of Looping
Statistical mechanics of looping involves the study of polymer chains forming closed loops through random molecular motion. When considering polymer loops, the statistical mechanics approach assesses the probability of a polymer chain's two ends meeting to form a loop. For polymers, these probabilities depend on the features like chain length and segment flexibility.
The Gaussian model serves as a foundational approach for studying polymer loops because it treats the polymer as a series of connected vectors governed by a normal distribution. In the Gaussian model, a polymer chain loop closes when it forms a complete cycle, creating a situation where the end-to-end vector from the start to finish is zero (R2=0), which ideally means returning to the starting point.
This condition, although mathematically neat, translates into a practically rare event for real molecular chains due to thermal fluctuations and chain flexibility. However, through statistical mechanics, we determine the likelihood of loops forming by examining the distribution of configurations, especially for very long chains, where fluctuations average out.
Random Walk Models
A random walk is a mathematical model used to represent a path comprising a series of random steps. When applied to polymer chain behavior, it models the molecular dynamics as each segment randomly moves, influencing the polymer's configuration.
This model is significant in understanding polymer loops. Visualize the random walk of a polymer as a path over which each step might lead in any direction, representing segments of a polymer chain. When simulating looping, the key factor is that the walk must ultimately return near its origin, closing the loop.
  • The one-dimensional random walk simplifies the polymer to steps along a line, useful for basic insights but limited for complex molecules.
  • The Gaussian model adapts this by treating the problem in a higher-dimensional context, yielding a more comprehensive analysis of looping behavior.
Thus, random walk models are essential tools in polymer science for their capability to predict loop formation and dynamics with reasonably accurate assumptions.
Polymer Chain Dynamics
Polymer chain dynamics refer to how polymer molecules move and interact. In a polymer, dynamics reflect how segments move relative to each other and the overall structure, including how it transforms or loops.
Key aspects include:
  • Segment movement: At the molecular level, each segment of the polymer chain experiences random thermal motion, contributing to the overall dynamics.
  • Chain flexibility: The ability of the chain to bend or rotate around its bonds affects how it can form loops.
  • Interactions with the environment: Polymers may experience forces from surrounding molecules or surfaces, influencing their dynamic behavior.
Understanding these dynamics, especially under conditions like forming and maintaining a loop, helps scientists and engineers develop materials with specific properties that depend on molecular motion, such as elasticity or strength, by tweaking chain properties.
Protein Domain Size
Protein domain size significantly impacts how a polymer loop forms, considering that proteins often serve as scaffolds or elements like ends of the loop. When accounting for protein sizes, it's crucial to think of proteins as spheres of influence constraining the polymer chain.
Imagine a protein domain like a spherical barrier in the random walk path of a polymer loop. It prevents crossing and demands that the loop forms within or around this sphere. This influences the potential configurations:
  • A larger domain size restricts where the loop can close, affecting the energetic favorability of conformations.
  • The presence of domains may induce a polymer chain to adopt particular configurations, aligning with functional or structural needs.
Thus, in practice, polymer looping must consider the physical size and positioning of these protein domains, as they impose a real, space-based limitation on how freely a polymer chain may loop. These size dynamics might impact how researchers engage with protein-polymer complexes in fields like biophysics and material science.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In this problem, we work out an expression for the repression for the case in which there are N plasmids, each harboring the same promoter subjected to repression by the simple repression motif. (a) Write a partition function for P RNA polymerase molecules that can bind to the plasmids, resulting in expression of our gene of interest. Take into account the cell's nonspecific reservoir and assume that PN Calculate the mean number of plasmids occupied by RNA polymerase, N. Could you just have predicted this result based on what you know about the N=1 case? (b) Work out an expression for the repression defined as  repression =N(R=0)N(R0) Make sure to take into account the distinct cases where \(NR,\) where R is the number of repressors, and assume that you are dealing with a weak promoter, namely (P/NNS)eβΔεpd1 (c) Show that your result yields the same expression for simple repression in the case where N=1 that we found in the chapter. (d) Consider the case where there are two plasmids (that is, N=2) and work out the repression as a function of the number of repressors and make a corresponding plot.

In the thermodynamic models of gene regulation discussed in the chapter, the RNA polymerase is treated as a single molecular species. While this might be a reasonable assumption for transcription in prokaryotes, in eukaryotes tens of different molecules need to come together in order to form the transcriptional machinery. The objective of this problem is to develop intuition about the requirements for our simple model to apply in such a complex case by assuming that the transcriptional machinery is made out of two different subunits, X and Y, that come together at the promoter. (a) Calculate the probability of finding the complex X+Y bound to the promoter in the case where unit X binds to DNA and unit Y binds to X. Can you reduce this to an effective one-molecule problem such as in the bacterial case? (b) Calculate the fold-change in gene expression for simple repression using transcriptional machinery such as that proposed in (a). Explore the weak promoter assumption in order to reduce the expression to that corresponding to the bacterial case. Repeat this for the case where an activator can contact Y. (c) Repeat (a) and (b) for a case where Y binds to a site on the DNA that is near the X-binding site, and there is an interaction energy between X and Y

The model of the Poisson promoter considered in the chapter assumed that the number of copies of the gene of interest was fixed at one. However, as a result of the replication of the chromosomal DNA, during some part of the cell cycle there will be two (or even more for rapidly dividing cells) copies of the gene of interest. In this problem, we imagine that during a fraction f of the cell cycle, there is one copy of our gene of interest and during the rest of the cell cycle there are two such copies. (a) Write down the appropriate distribution p(m) for m mRNA molecules as a function of the parameter f (b) Find m (c) Find m2 and use it to find the Fano factor. (d) Plot the Fano factor as a function of f for different choices of the mean mRNA copy number for a single promoter. How "Poissonian" do you expect an unregulated promoter to be? (Problem courtesy of Rob Brewster and Daniel Jones.)

In chemotaxis experiments, a source of nutrient molecules can be introduced into the medium containing bacteria via a micropipette. The outward diffusion of the nutrient molecules creates a position-dependent concentration gradient, and the chemotactic response of the bacteria can be observed under a microscope. (a) Estimate the nutrient gradient in steady state as a function of the distance from the micropipette r by assuming that it keeps the concentration fixed at c0 for distances \(r

An important concept in gene regulation is the sensitivity, that is, how steep is the change in gene expression (for example, the steepness of the transition from the "off" to the "on" state in activation) in response to a change in the number of transcription factors. It can be quantified by obtaining the slope on a log-log plot of the level of gene expression versus the number of transcription factors at this transition. Using thermodynamic models of gene regulation, determine how the sensitivity depends on the relevant parameters for the following regulatory motifs in the case of a weak promoter: (a) Simple activation. (b) Simple repression. (c) Two binding sites where the same species of repressor can bind. They can recruit each other and repress RNA polymerase independently. What happens when the interaction is turned off? For simplicity, assume that both binding sites have the same binding energy. (d) Repression in the presence of DNA looping.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free