Chapter 10: Problem 2
Flexural rigidity of biopolymers (a) Recall from \(\mathrm{p} .389\) that when treating macromolecules as elastic beams it is the combination \(K_{\mathrm{eff}}=E I,\) the flexural rigidity, that dictates the stiffness of that molecule. The flexural rigidity is a product of an energetic ( \(E,\) Young modulus) and geometric \((I,\) areal moment of inertia) factor. Reproduce the argument given in the chapter that culminated in Equation 10.8 for the bending energy of a beam and show that the flexural rigidity enters as claimed above. (b) Using what you know about the geometry of DNA, actin filaments, and microtubules, determine the areal moment of inertia \(I\) for each of these molecules. Be careful and remember that microtubules are hollow. Make sure that you comment on the various simplifications that you are making when you replace the macromolecule by some simple geometry. (c) Given that the elastic modulus of actin is \(2.3 \mathrm{GPa}\), take as your working hypothesis that \(E\) is universal for the macromolecules of interest here and has a value 2 GPa. In light of this choice of modulus, compute the stress needed to stretch both actin and DNA with a strain of \(1 \%\). Convert this result into a pulling force in piconewtons. (d) Using the results from (b) and (c), compute the persistence lengths of all three of these molecules. (e) Given that the measured persistence length of DNA is \(50 \mathrm{nm},\) and using the areal moment of inertia you computed in (b), compute the Young modulus of DNA. How well does it agree with our 2 GPa rule of thumb from above?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.