Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the last section of the chapter we considered the action of N-wasp using a simple one-dimensional random-walk model to treat the statistical mechanics of looping. Redo that analysis by using the Gaussian model of a polymer chain. First, assume that the loop has to close on itself and then account for the finite size of the protein domain. Compare your results with those obtained in the chapter.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The application of the Gaussian model to a polymer chain results in the relationship \(R = a\sqrt{N}\). By adjusting for the loop closure and protein size, effective size and behavior of the polymer chain can be deduced. Comparing between the Gaussian model's outcome and chapter results, differences and similarities bring forth an understanding of the suitability of different models in different contexts.

Step by step solution

01

Applying Gaussian Model

The first step involves applying the Gaussian model to the polymer chain. In the Gaussian model, the end-to-end distance \(R\) of the polymer chain is proportional to the square root of the number of segments \(N\), for a large \(N\). Hence, \(R = a\sqrt{N}\), where \(a\) is segment length and equal to the size of a monomer.
02

Closing the Loop

Next, assume that the loop has to close on itself. This means the ends of the polymer chain will be connected to each other. In this case, the Gaussian chain becomes a Gaussian ring. If the polymer length is high enough, one can assume that the spatial extent of the protein is significantly less than the spatial extent of the chain itself.
03

Accounting for Finite Size

Next, account for the finite size of the protein domain. To do this, subtract the protein size from the total end-to-end distance of the polymer. This gives a meaningful physical parameter that tells how the effective size of the polymer chain is influenced by the protein.
04

Compare with Previous Results

Compare your results from the Gaussian model analysis with those obtained in the chapter. Analyze how these two models differ in treating the problem and what are the individual strengths or weaknesses of these methods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gaussian Model
The Gaussian Model is a foundational concept in polymer physics, providing a simplified representation of a polymer chain. This model describes the polymer chain as a sequence of segments, each of equal length, connected in a random arrangement. The key characteristic of the Gaussian Model is that it assumes the polymer chain will behave like a random coil rather than adopting a fixed shape.

In this model, the end-to-end distance, denoted by \( R \), is a measure of how spread out the polymer chain is. It is calculated using the formula \( R = a\sqrt{N} \), where \( a \) is the length of each segment and \( N \) is the number of segments within the polymer. This relationship indicates that \( R \) grows proportionately with the square root of the number of segments, emphasizing that the polymer's expansion is not linear but rather follows a root-dependant relation.

The Gaussian Model is particularly useful in describing polymers consisting of a large number of segments where thermal fluctuation dominates over any configurational preference. Thus, it is widely applicable for understanding macromolecular chains, such as DNA or synthetic polymers, in various states and conditions.
Random-Walk Model
The Random-Walk Model is another fundamental concept used in the study of polymer physics, especially when analyzing the behavior of polymer chains over time. This model views each segment of a polymer chain as taking a step in a randomly chosen direction, similar to the random path drawn in a walk.

In a simple one-dimensional random walk, each step enhances or diminishes the end-to-end distance of the chain. Consequently, its position changes but not in a fixed or predictable way.
  • This model provides insights into the polymer's ability to fill volume in a given space, reflecting its spatial conformation.
  • It helps demonstrate how these dynamic steps can represent the overall dynamics of a polymer chain in strong states of fluctuation or movement.
The Random-Walk Model is particularly beneficial for understanding the dynamic properties of polymers, such as diffusion and flexibility. It can also be employed to study the behavior of polymers under various constraints, such as confined environments, or when connected to other chemical groups, forming loops or branching.
Statistical Mechanics
Statistical mechanics is the key theoretical framework bridging the microscopic properties of individual particles with the macroscopic properties of materials, such as temperature and pressure. In the context of polymer physics, statistical mechanics is crucial for predicting and understanding the collective behavior of polymer chains.

The theory operates on probabilities, predicting only the likelihood of a particle being in a particular state rather than its precise position. In polymer science, this translates into understanding averages, such as average size, shape, and energy of polymer chains in a given environment.
  • It plays a central role in predicting polymer behavior under different conditions, accounting for thermal fluctuations.
  • Statistical mechanics allows for the calculation of properties such as elasticity, viscosity, and thermal expansion from given polymer structure inputs.
By utilizing statistical mechanics, scientists can simulate polymer behavior in larger systems or under assumptions provided by models like the Gaussian chain. This becomes crucial in designing materials with specific mechanical properties or in understanding complex biological polymer systems like proteins and nucleic acids.
Polymer Chain Dynamics
Understanding Polymer Chain Dynamics is imperative in polymer physics to analyze how polymers move and interact on a molecular level. This study focuses on how the chain adjusts its shape and structure when exposed to different stimuli, such as temperature changes, forces, or chemical environments.

Key to this concept is the dynamic nature of polymers, wherein they exhibit both high flexibility and resilience simultaneously.
  • Chain dynamics are largely influenced by the flexibility of the polymer segments and the interactions among them.
  • Additionally, external factors like solvents, environmental temperature, or mechanical stress can significantly alter the movement patterns of polymer chains.
Analyzing dynamics provides critical insights into how polymers can be designed or tuned for specific applications, such as in flexible electronics, responsive materials, or even in understanding biological macromolecules. The ability to predict how these chains evolve under various conditions helps in regulating processes like diffusion, entanglement, and reaction kinetics essential for material science and engineering.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An important concept in gene regulation is the sensitivity, that is, how steep is the change in gene expression (for example, the steepness of the transition from the OFF to the ON state in activation) in response to a change in the number of transcription factors. It can be quantified by obtaining the slope on a log-log plot of the level of gene expression vs. the number of transcription factors at this transition. Using thermodynamic models of gene regulation determine how the sensitivity depends on the relevant parameters for the following regulatory motifs in the case of a weak promoter:(a) Simple activation. (b) Simple repression. (c) Two binding sites where the same species of repressor can bind. They can recruit each other and repress RNA polymerase independently. What happens when the interaction is turned oft? For simplicity, assume that both binding sites have the same binding energy. (d) Repression in the presence of DNA looping.

For transcription to start the RNA polymerase bound to the promoter needs to undergo a conformational change to the so-called open complex. The rate of open complex formation is often much smaller than the rates for the polymerase binding and falling off the promoter. Here we investigate within a simple model how this state of affairs might justify the equilibrium assumption under Iying thermodynamic models of gene regulation, namely that the equilibrium probability that the promoter is occu pied by the RNA polymerase determines the level of gene expression.(a) Write down the chemical kinetics equation for this situation. Consider three states: RNA polymerase bound nonspecifically on the DNA (N), RNA polymerase bound to the promoter in the closed cormplex (C), and RNA poly. merase bound to the promoter in the open complex (0). To simplify matters take both the rate for \(\mathrm{N} \rightarrow \mathrm{C}\) and the rate for \(C \rightarrow N\) to be \(k\), Assume that the transition \(C \rightarrow 0\) is irreversible, with rate \(r\) (b) For \(\Gamma=0,\) show that in the steady state there are equal numbers of RNA polymerases in the N and C states. What is the steady state in the case \(r \neq 0 ?\) (c) For the case \(r \neq 0,\) show that for times \(1 / k

In the thermodynamic models of gene regulation discussed in the chapter the RNA polymerase is treated as a single molecular species. While this might be a reasonable assumption for transcription in prokaryotes, in eukary. otes tens of different molecules need to come together in order to form the transcriptional machinery. The objective of this problem is to develop intuition about the requirements for our simple model to apply in such a com plex case by assuming that the transcriptional machinery is made out of two different subunits. \(X\) and \(Y\), that come together at the promoter. (a) Calculate the probability of finding the complex \(x+Y\) bound to the promoter in the case where unit \(x\) binds to DNA and unit \(Y\) binds to \(X\). Can you reduce this to an effective one molecule problem such as in the bacterial case? (b) Calculate the fold change in gene expression for \(\operatorname{sim}\) ple repression using transcriptional machinery such as that proposed in part (a). Explore the weak promoter assumption in order to reduce the expression to that corresponding to the bacterial case. Repeat this for the case where an activator can contact \(Y\) (c) Repeat parts \((a)\) and \((b)\) for a case when \(Y\) binds to a site on the DNA which is near the \(X\) binding site, and there is an interaction energy between \(X\) and \(Y\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free