Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that a 2 -form \(\omega\) is nondegenerate if and only if the determinant of \(\left(\omega_{i j}\right)\) is nonzero if and only if \(\omega^{b}\) is an isomorphism.

Short Answer

Expert verified
We have shown that a 2-form \(\omega\) being nondegenerate is equivalent to it having a nonzero determinant, which is also equivalent to \(\omega^{b}\) being an isomorphism.

Step by step solution

01

Prove Nondegenerate Implies Nonzero Determinant

Assume \(\omega\) is a 2-form that is nondegenerate, meaning that for every nonzero vector \(v\), there is a vector \(w\) such that \(\omega(v, w) \neq 0\). The determinant of \(\left(\omega_{i j}\right)\) represents the volume of the parallelepiped spanned by the vectors of \(\omega\). If \(\omega\) is nondegenerate, it implies that the parallelepiped has a positive volume, hence the determinant of \(\left(\omega_{i j}\right)\) is nonzero.
02

Prove Nonzero Determinant Implies Isomorphism

Assume the determinant of \(\left(\omega_{i j}\right)\) is nonzero, then the vectors of \(\omega\) span the space. This implies that for every vector \(v\) in the space, we can find coefficients for the vectors of \(\omega\) such that the sum equals \(v\). Hence, \(\omega^{b}\) is an isomorphism.
03

Prove Isomorphism Implies Nonzero Determinant

If \(\omega^{b}\) is an isomorphism, then it maps vectors one-to-one from the space to itself. This implies that the vectors of \(\omega\) form a basis of the space and can form a nonzero volume parallelepiped for the space. Hence, the determinant of \(\left(\omega_{i j}\right)\) is nonzero.
04

Prove Nonzero Determinant Implies Nondegenerate

When the determinant of \(\left(\omega_{i j}\right)\) is nonzero, it implies that the vectors of \(\omega\) form a basis of the space and thus for any nonzero vector \(v\) in the space, we are able to find a corresponding vector \(w\) such that \(\omega(v, w) \neq 0\). Hence, \(\omega\) is nondegenerate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Nondegenerate 2-form
A nondegenerate 2-form is a concept typically encountered in the study of differential geometry and linear algebra. Simply put, a 2-form on a vector space is called nondegenerate if, given any nonzero vector, there is another vector such that the 2-form applied to both does not vanish. In mathematical terms, it's like having a formula that, when two different inputs are combined, always results in a noteworthy or significant output rather than zero.

This property is crucial because it ensures that the 2-form can "pair" vectors in a meaningful way. Imagine it like a board game where every piece has a unique pair ensuring that the game continues smoothly without any piece being isolated or redundant.

To visualize this, consider that this condition guarantees that the geometrical object formed by these vectors, often represented by the matrix \[ \left(\omega_{ij}\right) \]is robust enough to hold its own shape. The matrix isn't allowed to degenerate into something lower-dimensional (such as collapsing into a line or point). This leads us directly into the concept of the determinant.
Determinant of a Matrix
The determinant is a special number that gives insight into certain properties of a square matrix. You can think of it as a measure of the matrix's "volume" or "size," in a sense. For a matrix arising from a 2-form, when we say the determinant is nonzero, we're really indicating that our matrix spans a volume in space.

Why is the determinant so important? Because a nonzero determinant tells us that the matrix, and hence the vectors it represents, maintain a certain three-dimensional space. In physical terms, the volume of a geometric shape described by these vectors is positive, so the shape hasn't collapsed.
  • If the determinant is zero, the shape collapses; meaning, the vectors are not enough to span the space.
  • Thus, a nonzero determinant confirms our matrix persists as a full-dimensional object, a key condition for the original form to be regarded as nondegenerate.
This creates a beautiful bridge between the abstract world of linear algebra and the more tangible concept of shapes and spaces in geometry. The nonzero determinant ensures the full-fledged dynamics of a 2-form are preserved in the space.
Isomorphism in Linear Transformations
An isomorphism in the context of vector spaces and forms is like having a perfect matchmaker. It ensures every pair of vectors can transform into each other in a one-to-one correspondence with a unique inverse. For a mapping to be an isomorphism, it must pass three tests:
  • It's a bijection, meaning it's both injective (no two inputs have the same output) and surjective (covers the entire target space).
  • The transformation preserves the structural properties of the space, including vector addition and scalar multiplication.
  • It has an inverse that undoes the effects of the original mapping.
So, why does a nondegenerate 2-form imply isomorphism? When the 2-form's associated matrix has a nonzero determinant, it spans the vector space fully. This ensures the transformation acts as a perfect pair-making agent (isomorphism), successfully preserving and converting every vector uniquely without losing any in translation. This kind of transformation is essential in defining equivalencies and symmetries within vector spaces, maintaining the integrity of their geometric and algebraic properties. Imagine translating a complex piece of music note by note into another language without losing any of its harmony or meaning; that's what an isomorphism achieves in mathematical terms.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\mathbf{b}\) be a symmetric bilinear form. Show that the kernel of \(\mathbf{b}_{*}: \mathcal{V} \rightarrow\) \(V^{*}\) consists of all vectors \(\mathbf{u} \in \mathcal{V}\) such that \(\mathbf{b}(\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v})=0\) for all \(\mathbf{v} \in \mathcal{V}\). Show also that in the \(\mathbf{b}\) -orthonormal basis \(\left\\{\mathbf{e}_{j}\right\\}\), the set \(\left\\{\mathbf{e}_{i} \mid \mathbf{b}\left(\mathbf{e}_{i}, \mathbf{e}_{i}\right)=0\right\\}\) is a basis of ker \(\mathbf{b}\), and therefore the set of linearly independent isotropic vectors is the nullity of \(\mathbf{b}\).

The Pauli spin matrices $$ \sigma^{1}=\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \sigma^{2}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \sigma^{3}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{array}\right) $$ describe a particle with spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. Verify that these matrices satisfy \(\left[\sigma^{i}, \sigma^{j}\right] \equiv \sigma^{i} \sigma^{j}-\sigma^{j} \sigma^{i}=2 i \epsilon_{k}^{i j} \sigma^{k}, \quad\left\\{\sigma^{i}, \sigma^{j}\right\\} \equiv \sigma^{i} \sigma^{j}+\sigma^{j} \sigma^{i}=2 \delta_{j}^{i} 1_{2}\), where \(1_{2}\) is the unit \(2 \times 2\) matrix. Show also that \(\sigma^{i} \sigma^{j}=i \epsilon_{k}^{i j} \sigma^{k}+\delta_{j}^{i} 1_{2}\), and for any two vectors a and \(\mathbf{b},(\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{a})(\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{b})=\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{b} 1_{2}+i \boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot(\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b})\).

Let \(\mathbf{A} \in \Lambda^{2}(\mathcal{V})\) with components \(A^{i j}\). Show that \(\mathbf{A} \wedge \mathbf{A}=0\) if and only if \(A^{i j} A^{k l}-A^{i k} A^{j l}+A^{i l} A^{j k}=0\) for all \(i, j, k, l\) in any basis.

In relativistic electromagnetic theory the current \(\mathbf{J}\) and the electromagnetic field tensor \(\mathbf{F}\) are, respectively, a four-vector \(^{8}\) and an antisymmetric tensor of rank \(2 .\) That is, \(\mathbf{J}=J^{k} \mathbf{e}_{k}\) and \(\mathbf{F}=F^{i j} \mathbf{e}_{i} \wedge \mathbf{e}_{j} .\) Find the components of \(* \mathbf{J}\) and \(* \mathbf{F}\). Recall that the space of relativity is a \(4 \mathrm{D}\) Minkowski space.

Show that \(\epsilon_{j_{1} j_{2} \ldots j_{N}} R_{i_{1}}^{j_{1}} \ldots R_{i_{N}}^{j_{N}}=\epsilon_{i_{1} i_{2} \ldots i_{N}} \operatorname{det} R\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free