Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Retroviruses are categorized in terms of host range. Define ecotropic, amphitropic, and xenotropic. What are interference groups?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Ecotropic retroviruses selectively infect and replicate within cells of their natural host species, while amphitropic retroviruses can infect both their natural host and cells from other species. Xenotropic retroviruses infect cells from different species but not their natural host. Interference groups refer to a phenomenon where one retrovirus blocks the infection of another within the same host cell due to competitive inhibition for receptors or resources.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Ecotropic Retroviruses

Ecotropic retroviruses are those that specifically infect and replicate within the cells of their natural host species. For example, if a retrovirus selectively infects the cells of mice, it would be considered an ecotropic virus for mice. These viruses have a restricted host range and cannot infect cells from other species.
02

Definition of Amphitropic Retroviruses

Amphitropic retroviruses, on the other hand, have a broader host range compared to ecotropic viruses. They can infect and replicate in both their natural host species and in cells from other species as well. These viruses have adapted to infect multiple species, making them more versatile than ecotropic viruses.
03

Definition of Xenotropic Retroviruses

Xenotropic retroviruses are unique in that they can infect cells from different species but not from their natural host species. They have evolved in such a way that their attachment receptors are not recognized by the cells of their natural host, making these viruses unable to infect their host of origin.
04

Explanation of Interference Groups

Interference groups refer to a phenomenon observed in retroviruses where a particular retrovirus can block the infection of another retrovirus within the same host cell. This competitive inhibition occurs when a retrovirus occupies cellular receptors or uses cellular resources that another retrovirus requires for replication. As a result, the second retrovirus is unable to infect the cells. Interference groups help researchers study the relatedness of different retroviruses based on how they interfere with each other's infections in host cells.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ecotropic Retroviruses

When considering the categorization of retroviruses, ecotropic retroviruses are often highlighted for their specific affinity to the cells within their natural host species. Think of these viruses as having a 'hometown preference'—they thrive and replicate solely within the species they originate from. A practical example is a retrovirus that infects only mouse cells; in this case, the virus is ecotropic to mice. It's important to understand that their specialization to a particular host also limits their ability to cross species barriers. They cannot infect cells of different species, which significantly contains their potential for zoonotic transfer—the jump of viruses from animals to humans.


In tackling exercises on ecotropic retroviruses, it's essential to appreciate why their restricted host range matters. They are instrumental in research involving specific animal models, as they avoid complications that might arise from infecting other unintentional hosts. This selective targeting also opens up possibilities for gene therapy, where their specificity can be used to deliver therapeutic genes to designated cells without affecting other cell types.

Amphitropic Retroviruses

Amphitropic retroviruses exhibit a more flexible nature compared to their ecotropic counterparts. These pathogens demonstrate a 'traveler's spirit' by being capable of infecting not just their natural host species but also cells from other species. Their adaptability to multiple hosts categorizes them as pathogens of concern for cross-species infections and emerging diseases. Amphitropic retroviruses are the opportunists of the viral world, taking advantage of broader infection opportunities to ensure their survival and proliferation.


In educational exercises related to these viruses, highlighting their diverse host range is crucial. It correlates to the potential risk they pose in cross-species transmission, which might have implications for public health and animal health. Their study might focus on understanding their evolution, how they've developed the ability to recognize cellular receptors across different species, and how this versatility might affect the dynamics of viral outbreaks.

Xenotropic Retroviruses

Xenotropic retroviruses break the conventional pattern of pathogen-host interactions. Unlike ecotropic and amphitropic retroviruses, xenotropic ones are the paradox of the viral world—they can infect cells from other species but interestingly not those of their own natural host. Imagine having a key that unlocks every door except the one it was originally designed for. This unusual characteristic provides a compelling subject of study, particularly in understanding viral evolution and host-virus interactions. Scientific fascination often circles around this 'outsider' status and the underlying mechanisms that lead to such selectivity.


Students grappling with the concept of xenotropic retroviruses should consider the implications of their unique host range. These viruses' alien nature in regard to their original hosts can shed light on how viruses adapt over time and how viral receptors and host cell receptors co-evolve. Since they can bypass their original host's immune defense, they might represent a different kind of threat or usefulness, depending on their pathogenicity or utility in study models.

Interference Groups

The concept of interference groups brings to light the competitive landscape of viral infections within a host cell. Just as plants in a garden might compete for sunlight and nutrients, so do retroviruses vie for the cellular resources and receptors necessary for their infection and replication. When a retrovirus manages to claim these resources, it secures its place within the cell but also inadvertently blocks other viruses from establishing an infection. This competitive inhibition forms the basis of interference groups, which are essentially exclusive clubs where only certain types of retroviruses can 'enter' and replicate within a cell.


In approaching educational exercises about interference groups, it is valuable to understand how this phenomenon can be used as a tool for research. By studying which viruses are capable of blocking others, researchers can discern the relationships between different retroviruses. This information can lead to discovering viral ancestries or understanding the mechanisms of viral entry and replication. Furthermore, interference groups provide insights into potential antiviral strategies that might be exploited to treat infections by using one virus to prevent the infection of another more harmful one.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The discovery of one aspect of retroviral replication fundamentally shook the field of genetics. What was that discovery? What core belief of molecular genetics did it invalidate?

Describe the retrovirus life cycle, starting with the free virus.

The predominant cell type infected by HIV is CD4 \(^{+}\) cells. The most important of these are the T-helper cells. (Review the immunogenetics chapter for a description of \(\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{H}}\) -cells.) As the disease progresses through latency into AIDS-related complex and finally ful1-blown AIDS, the absolute number of CD4 \(^{+}\) cells (i.e., \(\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{H}^{-}}\) cells \()\) decreases. The rate of \(\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{H}}\) -cell deletion increases as the patient enters \(\mathrm{ARC}\). As the number of \(\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{H}}\) -cells decreases, the ratio of \(\mathrm{CD} 4^{+}\) to \(\mathrm{CD} 8^{+}\) cells inverts, going from about \(2: 1\) to less than \(1: 2 .\) Why is the \(\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{H}^{-}}\) cell such a devastating target?

Some HIV isolates differ in their ability to infect various alternative hosts. You learn that these strains differ genetically at one or more clusters in the genome. One of these regions of variability is far more prominent than others. What would you expect to be located at that part of the genome? Why?

Retroviruses are also divided into three official taxonomic groups, assignments into which are purely functional. Name the three taxonomic divisions and the characteristics of each. To which group or groups do the human pathogens belong?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free