Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Mendel crossed peas having round seeds and yellow cotyledons with peas having wrinkled seeds and green cotyledons. All the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) plants had round seeds with yellow cotyledons. Diagram this cross through the \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) generation, using both the Punnett square and forked-line methods.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The phenotypic ratio in the F2 generation is 9 round & yellow : 3 round & green : 3 wrinkled & yellow : 1 wrinkled and green.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Parental Genotypes

We begin by determining the genotypes of the parent plants. The first parent has round seeds and yellow cotyledons, so its genotype must be RRYY. The second parent has wrinkled seeds and green cotyledons, so its genotype must be rryy.
02

Determine the F1 Generation Genotype

Next, we look at the F1 generation. Since all the F1 plants have round seeds and yellow cotyledons, their genotype must be RrYy.
03

Create a Punnett Square for the F2 Generation

In order to determine the F2 generation genotypes, we must first create a Punnett square. To do this, we will first find the possible gametes that can be formed from the F1 generation: Gametes from parent 1 (RrYy): RY, Ry, rY, ry Gametes from parent 2 (RrYy): RY, Ry, rY, ry Now, we use these gametes to construct a 4x4 Punnett square table.
04

Fill in the Punnett Square

Now we fill in the Punnett square table with the corresponding genotypes: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c} & RY & Ry & rY & ry \\ \hline RY & RRYY & RRYy & RrYY & RrYy \\ Ry & RRYy & RRyy & RrYy & Rryy \\ rY & RrYY & RrYy & rrYY & rrYy \\ ry & RrYy & Rryy & rrYy & rryy \end{tabular}
05

Determine the F2 Generation Phenotypes

Now we need to determine the phenotypes in the F2 generation based on the genotypes: 1. RRYY, RRYy, RrYY, and RrYy all result in round seeds and yellow cotyledons. 2. RRyy and Rryy result in round seeds and green cotyledons. 3. rrYY and rrYy result in wrinkled seeds and yellow cotyledons. 4. rryy results in wrinkled seeds and green cotyledons. Thus, we have a phenotypic ratio of 9 round & yellow : 3 round & green : 3 wrinkled & yellow : 1 wrinkled and green in the F2 generation.
06

Forked-Line Method

Now, let's use the forked-line method to confirm the phenotypic ratio. We will first look at the seed shape and then the cotyledon color: Seed Shape: Rr x Rr 3 round (1 RR, 2 Rr) : 1 wrinkled (rr) Cotyledon Color: Yy x Yy 3 yellow (1 YY, 2 Yy) : 1 green (yy) Now, we combine the traits using the forked-line method: (3 round : 1 wrinkled) x (3 yellow : 1 green) 9 round & yellow : 3 round & green : 3 wrinkled & yellow : 1 wrinkled and green We can see that both the Punnett square method and the forked-line method give us the same phenotypic ratio for the F2 generation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Punnett Square Analysis
The Punnett square is a foundational tool in Mendelian genetics, providing a visual representation of genetic crosses. It allows us to predict the genotypes and phenotypes of offspring from parents with known genetic makeup. Let's begin by identifying the potential gametes from a given parent. For a genotype RrYy, the possible gametes are RY, Ry, rY, and ry.

To construct the Punnett square for an F2 generation with parents both having the RrYy genotype, we create a 4x4 grid. Each cell within the grid is filled by combining one gamete from the father and one from the mother. This simple method demonstrates all possible genetic combinations for the offspring, with each cell representing an equally likely genotype.

While analyzing the Punnett square, the phenotypic outcome can be determined by reviewing the genotypes. For instance, the genotype RRYY or RrYy would result in round seeds and yellow cotyledons, as R (round) and Y (yellow) are dominant traits over their recessive counterparts r (wrinkled) and y (green), respectively. Thus, the Punnett square is an intuitive way to visualize and calculate the expected outcomes of genetic crosses.
Forked-Line Method
The forked-line method, also known as the branching diagram method, is another approach to visualize Mendelian crosses and to verify phenotypic ratios determined by a Punnett square. This method is particularly efficient when dealing with dihybrid crosses (crosses involving two traits).

To apply this method, each trait is considered separately and probabilities for each phenotype are determined. For example, when considering seed shape (Rr x Rr), we obtain a 3:1 ratio for round to wrinkled seeds. Similarly, for cotyledon color (Yy x Yy), a 3:1 ratio for yellow to green is found.

Next, the phenotypic ratios of each trait are multiplied together, akin to the branches of a fork. This is where the method gets its name. For the given exercise, this process results in a combined phenotypic ratio of 9 round & yellow: 3 round & green: 3 wrinkled & yellow: 1 wrinkled & green seeds. The simplicity of multiplying separate trait ratios makes the forked-line method a faster alternative to the Punnett square, particularly for complex crosses.
Phenotypic Ratios
Phenotypic ratios are key to understanding the quantitative aspect of Mendelian genetics. They express the proportion of various phenotypes (observable traits) appearing in the offspring. From our F2 generation, the Punnett square and forked-line method both confirm a phenotypic ratio of 9:3:3:1 for round yellow, round green, wrinkled yellow, and wrinkled green seeds, respectively.

Each number in this ratio corresponds to a specific combination of characteristics determined by the dominant and recessive alleles inherited from the parents. The dominant traits, in this case, are round seeds (R) and yellow cotyledons (Y), overshadow the recessive traits, which are wrinkled seeds (r) and green cotyledons (y).

Understanding phenotypic ratios is crucial for predicting the outcome of genetic crosses and for identifying the dominant and recessive nature of specific traits. It can also help in understanding the concept of probability within genetics and the likelihood of an offspring displaying a particular phenotype.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Mendel crossed peas with round, green seeds with peas having wrinkled, yellow seeds. All \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) plants had seeds that were round and yellow. Predict the results of testcrossing these \(F_{1}\) plants.

A plant breeder observed that for a certain leaf trait of maize that shows two phenotypes (phenotype 1 and phenotype 2), the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) generation exhibits 200 plants with phenotype 1 and 160 with phenotype 2. Using two different null hypotheses and chi-square analysis, compute if the data fits (a) a 3: 1 ratio, and (b) a 1: 1 ratio.

Define critical \(p\) value. Explain what significance this value has for predicting the reproducibility of an experiment involving crosses. Explain why the null hypothesis is generally rejected for \(p\) values lower than 0.05

Consider three independently assorting gene pairs, \(A / a, B / b,\) and \(C / c,\) where each demonstrates typical dominance \((A-, B-, C-)\) and recessiveness \((a a, b b, c c) .\) What is the probability of obtaining an offspring that is \(A A B b C c\) from parents that are \(A a B b C C\) and \(A A B b C c ?\)

In this chapter, we focused on the Mendelian postulates, probability, and pedigree analysis. We also considered some of the methods and reasoning by which these ideas, concepts, and techniques were developed. On the basis of these discussions, what answers would you propose to the following questions: (a) How was Mendel able to derive postulates concerning the behavior of "unit factors" during gamete formation, when he could not directly observe them? (b) How do we know whether an organism expressing a dominant trait is homozygous or heterozygous? (c) In analyzing genetic data, how do we know whether deviation from the expected ratio is due to chance rather than to another, independent factor? (d) since experimental crosses are not performed in humans, how do we know how traits are inherited?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free