Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Define critical \(p\) value. Explain what significance this value has for predicting the reproducibility of an experiment involving crosses. Explain why the null hypothesis is generally rejected for \(p\) values lower than 0.05

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The critical p-value is a threshold below which the p-value is considered significant, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. It is crucial in predicting the reproducibility of experiments by determining whether the observed results are due to random chance or actual differences between compared groups. The null hypothesis is usually rejected for p-values lower than 0.05 due to the convention of using a 5% level of significance to balance Type I and Type II errors. This threshold represents a 5% risk of committing a Type I error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true), which is considered an acceptable balance in most research studies, ensuring that the risk of drawing incorrect conclusions is minimized.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of P-value and Critical P-value

The p-value is the probability of obtaining results as extreme or more extreme than the observed data, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. It helps in determining the statistical significance of the results. The critical p-value is a threshold below which the p-value is considered significant, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.
02

Significance of Critical P-value in Reproducibility

In experiments involving crosses, such as genetic experiments, the critical p-value helps in predicting the reproducibility of the experiment by providing a means to determine whether the observed results are due to random chance or due to a contrast between two or more compared groups. By setting a critical p-value, researchers can define the level of significance they are willing to accept for their results, and it sets a degree of confidence in the reproducibility of the experiment.
03

Null Hypothesis Rejection for P-values Lower Than 0.05

The null hypothesis is generally rejected for p values lower than 0.05 due to the convention of using a 5% level of significance as a balance between Type I and Type II errors. Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is true, but it is rejected, while Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is false, but it is not rejected. The 0.05 threshold represents a 5% risk of committing a Type I error, which has been considered an acceptable balance in most research contexts. This convention helps standardize the level of significance across various studies while ensuring that the risk of drawing incorrect conclusions is minimized.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
Understanding the weight of evidence in scientific inquiry is crucial, and that's where statistical significance comes into play. It's a measure that helps researchers determine whether their findings are likely due to some real effect or simply a random chance occurrence. When a result is statistically significant, it means that the data collected give strong reason to believe that there is a genuine effect or difference present, beyond what random variation can explain.

In practical terms, statistical significance is often determined by comparing the p-value from a study's results to a predetermined critical p-value threshold. If the p-value falls below this threshold, the result is considered statistically significant. This is because a low p-value indicates that the observed outcome would be very unlikely if the null hypothesis were true, implying that the alternative hypothesis may be the better explanation for the data.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a default statement used in statistical hypothesis testing that assumes no effect or no difference exists. It is essentially a skeptical position, reflecting a standpoint that any observed differences or effects are due to chance alone. As part of the scientific method, the null hypothesis acts as a foil for the alternative hypothesis—the one that researchers really want to support.

For example, if you are testing a new drug, the null hypothesis might state that the drug has no effect on patients, compared to a placebo. It's a methodical way to challenge and verify the results of an experiment. Researchers set out to disprove the null hypothesis, and if they can reject it with sufficient confidence (usually at a p-value below 0.05), they can then support the alternative hypothesis. The rigorous testing against the null hypothesis aims to ensure that evidence for a real effect or difference isn't just due to random chance.
Reproducibility of Experiments
Reproducibility of experiments is a cornerstone of reliable scientific research. Reproducibility refers to the ability of an entirely independent research team to produce the same results using the same methods, data, and analysis procedures. This concept is critical because it validates the original findings and ensures that the results are not an artifact of peculiar conditions or biases specific to the initial experiment.

To enhance reproducibility, researchers must record their methodology in detail and use statistical measures, such as the critical p-value, to assess the reliability of their results. By ensuring a result can be reproduced, and by consistently applying statistical standards like the critical p-value threshold, scientists bolster the integrity of their work and enhance confidence in the knowledge generated by research.
Critical P-value Threshold
The critical p-value threshold is a predefined point at which scientists decide whether their results are statistically significant. It serves as a line in the sand, separating results that are likely to simply be random occurrences from those that might indicate a real effect or difference.

The most commonly used critical p-value threshold is 0.05. If the p-value obtained from an experiment's data is less than 0.05, researchers will reject the null hypothesis, which posits that there's no true effect. Choosing a critical threshold involves a trade-off between the risk of a Type I error (incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis) and a Type II error (failing to reject a false null hypothesis). The 0.05 level is widely accepted as it suggests there is less than a 5% probability that the results are due to chance—in other words, it provides a 95% confidence level in the findings, striking a balance between being too lax and too stringent on the evidence required to claim a significant result.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In an intra-species cross performed in mustard plants of two different species (Brassicajuncea and Brassica oleracea), a tall plant \((T T)\) was crossed with a dwarf (tt) variety in each of the two species. The members of the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) generation were crossed to produce the \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) generation. Of the \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) plants, Brassica juncea had 60 tall and 20 dwarf plants, while Brassica oleracea had 100 tall and 20 dwarf plants. Use chi-square analysis to analyze these results.

Albinism, lack of pigmentation in humans, results from an autosomal recessive gene (a). Two parents with normal pigmentation have an albino child. (a) What is the probability that their next child will be albino? (b) What is the probability that their next child will be an albino girl? (c) What is the probability that their next three children will be albino?

Among dogs, short hair is dominant to long hair and dark coat color is dominant to white (albino) coat color. Assume that these two coat traits are caused by independently segregating gene pairs. For each of the crosses given below, write the most probable genotype (or genotypes if more than one answer is possible) for the parents. It is important that you select a realistic symbol set and define each symbol below. (a) dark, short \(\times\) dark, long \(26 \quad 24 \quad 0\) (b) albino, short \(\times\) albino, short \(0 \quad 0 \quad 102 \quad 33\) (c) dark, short \(\times\) albino, short \(16 \quad 0 \quad 16\) (d) dark, short \(\times\) dark, short \(175 \quad 67 \quad 61 \quad 21\) Assume that for cross (d), you were interested in determining whether fur color follows a 3: 1 ratio. Set up (but do not complete the calculations) a Chi-square test for these data [fur color in cross (d)].

Why was the garden pea a good choice as an experimental organism in Mendel's work?

A plant breeder observed that for a certain leaf trait of maize that shows two phenotypes (phenotype 1 and phenotype 2), the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) generation exhibits 200 plants with phenotype 1 and 160 with phenotype 2. Using two different null hypotheses and chi-square analysis, compute if the data fits (a) a 3: 1 ratio, and (b) a 1: 1 ratio.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free