Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A plant breeder observed that for a certain leaf trait of maize that shows two phenotypes (phenotype 1 and phenotype 2), the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) generation exhibits 200 plants with phenotype 1 and 160 with phenotype 2. Using two different null hypotheses and chi-square analysis, compute if the data fits (a) a 3: 1 ratio, and (b) a 1: 1 ratio.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. Answer: The data better fits the 1:1 ratio, though the fit is not strict. The calculated chi-square value of 4.44 is slightly greater than the critical chi-square value of 3.84, indicating a stronger support for the 1:1 ratio even though it does not strictly fit the data. Meanwhile, the data does not fit the 3:1 ratio, since the calculated chi-square value (72.59) is far greater than the critical chi-square value (3.84).

Step by step solution

01

Collect given data

We have 200 plants with phenotype 1 and 160 plants with phenotype 2 in the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) generation. We will first perform a chi-square analysis for a 3:1 ratio and then for a 1:1 ratio.
02

Calculate the expected numbers for the 3:1 ratio hypothesis

A 3:1 ratio means that there will be 3 times more plants with phenotype 1 than with phenotype 2. To calculate the expected number of plants in each phenotype, we can first calculate the total number of plants and divide that by the ratio denominator (3+1) = 4, and then multiply each ratio part by the quotient. Total number of plants = 200 + 160 = 360 For phenotype 1 (3 parts of ratio): Expected number = (360 / 4) * 3 = 270 For phenotype 2 (1 part of ratio): Expected number = (360 / 4) * 1 = 90
03

Perform Chi-square test for the 3:1 ratio hypothesis

The chi-square formula is: \(\chi^2 = \sum\frac{(O-E)^2}{E}\), where \(O\) is the observed value and \(E\) is the expected value. For phenotype 1: \(\chi^2_1 = \frac{(200-270)^2}{270} = \frac{(-70)^2}{270} = \frac{4900}{270} = 18.15\) For phenotype 2: \(\chi^2_2 = \frac{(160-90)^2}{90} = \frac{70^2}{90} = \frac{4900}{90} = 54.44\) Total chi-square value: \(\chi^2 = 18.15 + 54.44 = 72.59\)
04

Calculate the expected numbers for the 1:1 ratio hypothesis

Now, let's test if the plant population fits a 1:1 ratio. Each phenotype will have half the total number of plants. Total number of plants = 360 For phenotype 1 (1 part of ratio): Expected number = (360 / 2) = 180 For phenotype 2 (1 part of ratio): Expected number = (360 / 2) = 180
05

Perform Chi-square test for the 1:1 ratio hypothesis

We will use the same chi-square formula from step 3 for the 1:1 ratio hypothesis. For phenotype 1: \(\chi^2_1 = \frac{(200-180)^2}{180} = \frac{20^2}{180} = \frac{400}{180} = 2.22\) For phenotype 2: \(\chi^2_2 = \frac{(160-180)^2}{180} = \frac{(-20)^2}{180} = \frac{400}{180} = 2.22\) Total chi-square value: \(\chi^2 = 2.22 + 2.22 = 4.44\)
06

Determine if data fits any of the ratios based on chi-square values

We have performed chi-square tests for both the 3:1 and 1:1 ratio hypotheses and obtained chi-square values of 72.59 and 4.44, respectively. To determine if the data fits either of these ratios, we will look for the critical chi-square value for a 5% level of significance and 1 degree of freedom (since there are 2 phenotypes). We find that the critical chi-square value is 3.84. Comparing the calculated chi-square values to the critical chi-square: - For the 3:1 ratio, the calculated chi-square (72.59) is far greater than the critical chi-square (3.84), suggesting that the observed data does not fit the 3:1 ratio. - For the 1:1 ratio, the calculated chi-square (4.44) is slightly greater than the critical chi-square (3.84), suggesting that the observed data does not strictly fit the 1:1 ratio either. However, the difference is minor, and it is relatively closer to the 1:1 ratio than the 3:1 ratio. In conclusion, the data does not fit the 3:1 ratio but provides stronger support for the 1:1 ratio even though the difference between calculated and critical chi-squares is minimal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Albinism, lack of pigmentation in humans, results from an autosomal recessive gene (a). Two parents with normal pigmentation have an albino child. (a) What is the probability that their next child will be albino? (b) What is the probability that their next child will be an albino girl? (c) What is the probability that their next three children will be albino?

In a cross between a black and a white guinea pig, all members of the \(F_{1}\) generation are black. The \(F_{2}\) generation is made up of approximately \(3 / 4\) black and \(1 / 4\) white guinea pigs. Diagram this cross, and show the genotypes and phenotypes.

Consider three independently assorting gene pairs, \(A / a, B / b,\) and \(C / c,\) where each demonstrates typical dominance \((A-, B-, C-)\) and recessiveness \((a a, b b, c c) .\) What is the probability of obtaining an offspring that is \(A A B b C c\) from parents that are \(A a B b C C\) and \(A A B b C c ?\)

Define critical \(p\) value. Explain what significance this value has for predicting the reproducibility of an experiment involving crosses. Explain why the null hypothesis is generally rejected for \(p\) values lower than 0.05

Among dogs, short hair is dominant to long hair and dark coat color is dominant to white (albino) coat color. Assume that these two coat traits are caused by independently segregating gene pairs. For each of the crosses given below, write the most probable genotype (or genotypes if more than one answer is possible) for the parents. It is important that you select a realistic symbol set and define each symbol below. (a) dark, short \(\times\) dark, long \(26 \quad 24 \quad 0\) (b) albino, short \(\times\) albino, short \(0 \quad 0 \quad 102 \quad 33\) (c) dark, short \(\times\) albino, short \(16 \quad 0 \quad 16\) (d) dark, short \(\times\) dark, short \(175 \quad 67 \quad 61 \quad 21\) Assume that for cross (d), you were interested in determining whether fur color follows a 3: 1 ratio. Set up (but do not complete the calculations) a Chi-square test for these data [fur color in cross (d)].

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free