Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The use of nucleotide sequence data to measure genetic variability is complicated by the fact that the genes of higher eukaryotes are complex in organization and contain \(5^{\prime}\) and \(3^{\prime}\) flanking regions as well as introns. Researchers have compared the nucleotide sequence of two cloned alleles of the \(\gamma\) -globin gene from a single individual and found a variation of 1 percent. Those differences include 13 substitutions of one nucleotide for another and 3 short DNA segments that have been inserted in one allele or deleted in the other. None of the changes takes place in the gene's exons (coding regions). Why do you think this is so, and should it change our concept of genetic variation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The observed changes in the cloned alleles of the gamma-globin gene do not occur in the gene's exons because of negative selection, which acts against harmful genetic changes in the coding regions. This prevents the spread of alleles that significantly impact protein structure or function. This observation does not necessarily change our concept of genetic variation, but it highlights the importance of considering the impact of changes in both coding and non-coding regions when studying genetic variation.

Step by step solution

01

To answer this question, we should first understand how genes are structured and what is meant by genetic variation. Genes are made up of coding regions (exons) and non-coding regions (introns), as well as flanking regions (\(5^{\prime}\) and \(3^{\prime}\)). The coding regions are translated into proteins, whereas the non-coding regions play various roles in regulating gene expression. Genetic variation refers to the differences in genes between individuals or populations, and it is often discussed in terms of nucleotide sequence differences. #Step 2: Consider the implications of changes in exons versus non-coding regions#

Since exons are the coding regions of a gene, any changes in the nucleotide sequence within these regions can potentially have a significant impact on the protein structure and function. This is because changes in the nucleotide sequence can lead to changes in the amino acid sequence of the protein, which can affect its folding, stability, and enzymatic activity. On the other hand, changes in the non-coding regions (introns and flanking regions) are less likely to have such a direct impact on the protein. These regions may still play roles in gene regulation, but alterations in these areas are usually less harmful to the organism. #Step 3: Explain why changes are not taking place in the exons#
02

Given this context, we can deduce that the reason why the observed changes do not take place in the exons is likely due to negative selection acting against such changes. Negative selection is a type of natural selection that removes deleterious alleles from a population; in this case, it prevents the spread of alleles with harmful changes in the coding regions. This means that genetic variants that cause significant changes in the protein structure or function are less likely to persist in the population. This is because individuals carrying such variants may have reduced fitness or may even die before they can reproduce and pass on these harmful variants. #Step 4: Discuss if this should change our concept of genetic variation#

While it is true that changes in the non-coding regions contribute to genetic variation, it does not necessarily mean that our overall concept of genetic variation should change. Genetic variation still encompasses differences in both coding and non-coding regions, with each type of variation having different implications for the organism. It is important to recognize that genetic variation can occur in both coding and non-coding regions and that each type of variation can have different effects on gene regulation, protein function, and overall organismal fitness. In this particular case, the observation underlines the importance of considering the impact of changes in both coding and non-coding regions when studying genetic variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Population geneticists study changes in the nature and amount of genetic variation in populations, the distribution of different genotypes, and how forces such as selection and drift act on genetic variation to bring about evolutionary change in populations and the formation of new species. From the explanation given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions? (a) How do we know how much genetic variation is in a population? (b) How do geneticists detect the presence of genetic variation as different alleles in a population? (c) How do we know whether the genetic structure of a population is static or dynamic? (d) How do we know when populations have diverged to the point that they form two different species? (e) How do we know the age of the last common ancestor shared by two species?

What is the original source of genetic variation in a population? Which natural factors affect changes in this original variation?

Calculate the frequencies of the \(A A, A a,\) and \(a a\) genotypes after one generation if the initial population consists of \(0.2 \mathrm{AA}, 0.6\) \(A a,\) and 0.2 aa genotypes and meets the requirements of the Hardy-Weinberg relationship. What genotype frequencies will occur after a second generation?

A form of dwarfism known as Ellis-van Creveld syndrome was first discovered in the late 1930 s, when Richard Ellis and Simon van Creveld shared a train compartment on the way to a pediatrics meeting. In the course of conversation, they discovered that they each had a patient with this syndrome. They published a description of the syndrome in \(1940 .\) Affected individuals have a short-limbed form of dwarfism and often have defects of the lips and teeth, and polydactyly (extra fingers). The largest pedigree for the condition was reported in an Old Order Amish population in eastern Pennsylvania by Victor McKusick and his colleagues \((1964) .\) In that community, about 5 per 1000 births are affected, and in the population of \(8000,\) the observed frequency is 2 per \(1000 .\) All affected individuals have unaffected parents, and all affected cases can trace their ancestry to Samuel King and his wife, who arrived in the area in \(1774 .\) It is known that neither King nor his wife was affected with the disorder. There are no cases of the disorder in other Amish communities, such as those in Ohio or Indiana. (a) From the information provided, derive the most likely mode of inheritance of this disorder. Using the Hardy-Weinberg law, calculate the frequency of the mutant allele in the population and the frequency of heterozygotes, assuming Hardy-Weinberg conditions. (b) What is the most likely explanation for the high frequency of the disorder in the Pennsylvania Amish community and its absence in other Amish communities?

Are there nucleotide substitutions that will not be detected by electrophoretic studies of a gene's protein product?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free