Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The genetic difference between two Drosophila species, \(D\). heteroneura and \(D .\) sylvestris, as measured by nucleotide diversity, is about 1.8 percent. The difference between chimpanzees (P. troglodytes) and humans (H. sapiens) is about the same, yet the latter species are classified in different genera. In your opinion, is this valid? Explain why.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your reasoning. Answer: Yes, it is valid to classify the primate species in different genera, despite having the same genetic difference as the Drosophila species. The primary reason is that genetic difference alone does not encompass the entirety of species differences. Factors such as morphology, reproductive compatibility, ecology, and evolutionary relationships also contribute to the classification of species, and these factors vary significantly between humans and chimpanzees. Therefore, their classification in different genera is justifiable.

Step by step solution

01

Define nucleotide diversity and genera

Nucleotide diversity is a measure of genetic variation between individuals within a population. It is calculated as the percentage of the nucleotide sites at which two randomly chosen DNA sequences from the population are expected to be different. Genera is a taxonomic category that is higher than species and lower than family. It groups together species that share common characteristics.
02

Discuss the factors considered while classifying species into different genera

The classification of species into different genera is based on numerous factors, which include: - Morphological similarities and differences: Physical traits, such as size, shape, and structure are compared. - Genetic similarities and differences: Genetic information is compared to reveal relationships between species. - Reproductive compatibility: Ability to interbreed and produce viable offspring is an important factor in classification. - Ecological similarities and differences: Species that share similar habitats, feeding habits, or other ecological factors may be grouped together. - Evolutionary relationships: Species with a common ancestor are likely to be in the same genera.
03

Compare these factors between the given species

While the genetic difference between the Drosophila species and the primate species is the same, other factors must be considered. - Morphology: Drosophila species are more morphologically similar to each other than chimpanzees and humans. Primates have distinct features, such as larger brains and specialized limbs for locomotion. - Reproductive compatibility: Humans and chimpanzees cannot interbreed and produce viable offspring, whereas Drosophila species may be more likely to do so. - Ecology: Chimpanzees and humans occupy different ecological niches and have varying social structures, whereas the Drosophila species may share more similar habits. - Evolutionary relationships: Chimpanzees and humans have a more distant common ancestor as compared to the Drosophila species.
04

Form a conclusion and express our opinion on the validity of classifying the primate species in different genera

Considering the factors mentioned above, it is valid to classify chimpanzees and humans in different genera, despite having the same genetic difference as the Drosophila species. The primary reason is that the genetic difference does not encompass the entirety of species differences. Morphology, reproductive compatibility, ecology, and evolutionary relationships also contribute to the classification of species. Since these factors vary significantly between humans and chimpanzees, their classification in different genera is justifiable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Nucleotide Diversity
Nucleotide diversity is an essential concept in understanding genetic variation within and between species. It measures the degree of genetic variation by calculating the average number of nucleotide differences per site between any two randomly selected DNA sequences from a population.
Nucleotide diversity can provide insights into the genetic health and adaptability of populations, acting as a window into past evolutionary pressures. Generally, higher nucleotide diversity indicates more variation, suggesting a population might possess a wider range of trait expressions.
  • It's crucial for identifying population bottlenecks or expansions.
  • Helps assess the genetic impact of colonization events.
  • Offers clues about a population's resilience to environmental changes.
Understanding nucleotide diversity is particularly useful in conservation biology, as it identifies populations at risk of extinction due to reduced genetic variability.
Genetic Variation
Genetic variation is the foundation of biological diversity. It refers to the differences in DNA sequences among individuals within a population or between populations. Such variations arise due to mutations, genetic recombination during sexual reproduction, and other evolutionary processes.
Genetic variation is pivotal as it enhances a population's ability to adapt to environmental changes, thus promoting survival and evolutionary success.
  • Provides the raw material for natural selection.
  • Leads to differences in traits such as disease resistance and physical appearance.
  • Integral for the evolution of new species over time.
In species classification, understanding genetic variation is vital as it often underpins morphological and ecological differences, guiding the classification of organisms into appropriate taxonomic categories.
Morphology
Morphology refers to the study of the form and structure of organisms. It involves examining traits like shape, size, and structure to differentiate species and understand their evolutionary relationships. These traits are visible physical characteristics that can be easily measured and observed.
In taxonomy, morphology serves as a fundamental basis for classifying organisms, especially when genetic data is not available. Here are a few reasons why morphology is crucial:
  • Used historically to differentiate species.
  • Provides insights into ecological roles and behaviors.
  • Helps identify convergent evolution, where species evolved similar traits independently.
While genetics offers deeper insights, morphological characteristics remain an essential tool in species classification, especially when assessing extinct species for which only fossils are available.
Taxonomic Classification
Taxonomic classification is an organized system used to categorize organisms into hierarchical groups based on shared characteristics. The system ranges from general groups (like kingdoms) to specific ones (such as species).
The main components of taxonomic classification include:
  • Kingdom
  • Phylum
  • Class
  • Order
  • Family
  • Genus
  • Species
Classifying species into various taxonomic ranks helps in understanding the evolutionary history and biological relationships among organisms. It also aids in the study and communication of biodiversity. Critical factors in classification include morphology, genetic data, reproductive compatibility, and ecological niche.
Taxonomic classification is dynamic and continues to evolve with advancements in genetic and molecular research, offering a more accurate reflection of evolutionary relationships.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Achondroplasia is a dominant trait that causes a characteristic form of dwarfism. In a survey of 50,000 births, five infants with achondroplasia were identified. Three of the affected infants had affected parents, while two had normal parents. Calculate the mutation rate for achondroplasia and express the rate as the number of mutant genes per given number of gametes.

What is the original source of genetic variation in a population? Which natural factors affect changes in this original variation?

A form of dwarfism known as Ellis-van Creveld syndrome was first discovered in the late 1930 s, when Richard Ellis and Simon van Creveld shared a train compartment on the way to a pediatrics meeting. In the course of conversation, they discovered that they each had a patient with this syndrome. They published a description of the syndrome in \(1940 .\) Affected individuals have a short-limbed form of dwarfism and often have defects of the lips and teeth, and polydactyly (extra fingers). The largest pedigree for the condition was reported in an Old Order Amish population in eastern Pennsylvania by Victor McKusick and his colleagues \((1964) .\) In that community, about 5 per 1000 births are affected, and in the population of \(8000,\) the observed frequency is 2 per \(1000 .\) All affected individuals have unaffected parents, and all affected cases can trace their ancestry to Samuel King and his wife, who arrived in the area in \(1774 .\) It is known that neither King nor his wife was affected with the disorder. There are no cases of the disorder in other Amish communities, such as those in Ohio or Indiana. (a) From the information provided, derive the most likely mode of inheritance of this disorder. Using the Hardy-Weinberg law, calculate the frequency of the mutant allele in the population and the frequency of heterozygotes, assuming Hardy-Weinberg conditions. (b) What is the most likely explanation for the high frequency of the disorder in the Pennsylvania Amish community and its absence in other Amish communities?

A certain form of albinism in humans is recessive and autosomal. Assume that \(1 \%\) of the individuals in a given population are albino. Assuming that the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, what percentage of the individuals in this population is expected to be heterozygous?

Are there nucleotide substitutions that will not be detected by electrophoretic studies of a gene's protein product?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free