Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

List the barriers that prevent interbreeding and give an example of each.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The barriers that prevent interbreeding between different species are categorized into two main groups: prezygotic barriers and postzygotic barriers. Prezygotic barriers include: 1. Habitat isolation (e.g., one frog species living in ponds while another inhabits the forest floor) 2. Temporal isolation (e.g., flowers blooming in different seasons) 3. Behavioral isolation (e.g., bird species having unique songs and dances to attract mates) 4. Mechanical isolation (e.g., specialized genitalia in certain insects that only fit with members of their own species) 5. Gametic isolation (e.g., marine animals with gametes that only fuse with gametes from the same species) Postzygotic barriers include: 1. Hybrid inviability (e.g., a liger, a hybrid between a lion and a tiger, being weaker and having a lower survival rate) 2. Hybrid sterility (e.g., a mule, a hybrid between a horse and a donkey, being unable to reproduce) 3. Hybrid breakdown (e.g., first-generation plant hybrids being viable but their offspring being weak or sterile).

Step by step solution

01

(Step 1: Identify the types of barriers)

To successfully solve this exercise, the student needs first to identify the main types of barriers that prevent interbreeding. These barriers are categorized into two major groups: prezygotic barriers and postzygotic barriers.
02

(Step 2: Explain prezygotic barriers)

Prezygotic barriers are factors that prevent fertilization between different species, thus preventing the formation of a hybrid zygote. Examples of prezygotic barriers include habitat isolation, temporal isolation, behavioral isolation, mechanical isolation, and gametic isolation.
03

(Step 3: Provide examples of prezygotic barriers)

Let's list some examples for the prezygotic barriers mentioned above: 1. Habitat isolation: Two species live in different habitats within the same general area, making it difficult for them to encounter each other for mating. For example, one species of frog may live in ponds while another species inhabits the forest floor. 2. Temporal isolation: Species reproduce at different times or seasons. For instance, some flowers bloom in spring while others bloom in summer. 3. Behavioral isolation: Mating rituals and other courtship behaviors are unique to each species, preventing members of different species from recognizing each other as a suitable mate. Birds often display different songs and dances to attract mates. 4. Mechanical isolation: Differences in reproductive structures prevent successful mating between species. For example, the genitalia of some insects can be so specialized that they can only mate with members of their own species. 5. Gametic isolation: Gametes from different species are incompatible and cannot successfully combine to form a zygote. In certain marine animals, for instance, their gametes are released into the water column, but only gametes from the same species will fuse together.
04

(Step 4: Explain postzygotic barriers)

Postzygotic barriers are factors that act after the formation of a hybrid zygote and lead to reduced fitness or viability of the hybrid offspring. Examples of postzygotic barriers include hybrid inviability, hybrid sterility, and hybrid breakdown.
05

(Step 5: Provide examples of postzygotic barriers)

Let's look at some examples for the postzygotic barriers mentioned above: 1. Hybrid inviability: Hybrid offspring do not develop fully or are unable to survive in their environment. For example, when a lion and a tiger breed, the resulting offspring, called a liger, is often weaker and has a lower survival rate than both parent species. 2. Hybrid sterility: Hybrid offspring are unable to reproduce, either due to the inability to produce viable gametes or due to reproductive structures' abnormalities. The mule, which is a hybrid offspring of a horse and a donkey, is a well-known example of hybrid sterility, as typically, mules cannot produce offspring. 3. Hybrid breakdown: The first generation of hybrid offspring may appear healthy and viable, but subsequent generations suffer from reduced fitness or fertility. In plants, this phenomenon can occur when interbreeding between two closely related species results in a viable hybrid, but the hybrid's offspring are weak or sterile.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Prezygotic Barriers
When nature puts up roadblocks to romance, we're talking about prezygotic barriers. These are biological factors that prevent different species from mating successfully, or if they do mate, from producing viable offspring.

Consider the case of two birds that evolved distinctive mating calls. These calls, a form of behavioral isolation, ensure that only birds of the same species answer to each other's love songs. Similarly, if one plant species discharges its pollen in the spring and another in the autumn, they're separated by temporal isolation—their dating schedules are misaligned.

Moving to a more visual cue, two species might have incompatible reproductive organs, a situation called mechanical isolation. It's as if nature designed a lock and key system where only the correct species has the matching parts. And let's not forget those who release their future offspring into the sea; if the sperm and egg can't unite in the open waters, it's termed gametic isolation, a microscopic mismatch of epic proportions.

These barriers are fascinating not just for their variety, but for their role in steering the course of biodiversity on our planet.
Postzygotic Barriers
Imagine that despite all odds, two different species do manage to produce offspring. What then? That's where postzygotic barriers step in. These are mechanisms that come into play after fertilization, ensuring that the resulting hybrid offspring does not continue the cycle.

Take the liger, for instance. This is a product of a lion and a tiger, and these majestic beasts usually suffer from hybrid inviability; they are less likely to thrive. Others, like the mule, are textbook cases of hybrid sterility. They're fit, they're sturdy, but when it comes to creating the next generation, they're unable to contribute genetically. And then there's the less talked about but equally important hybrid breakdown. Here, the first mixed-species generation might be fine, but down the genetic line, their descendants run into trouble with survival or fertility.

The existence of these barriers reflects a complex evolutionary tapestry, where nature finds ways to maintain diversity by limiting how species combine their genetic guises.
Speciation Mechanisms
When Luke Skywalker asks Yoda how the Force binds the galaxy together, think of speciation as the Force of biology – it's the power that shapes life's diversity. Species form in a process known as speciation, where new, distinct groups emerge that can no longer interbreed.

One way this happens is through allopatric speciation, similar to two people growing apart because they've moved to different cities. If a river shifts course or a mountain range rises and separates populations, those groups might evolve in isolation until they're completely different species. Alternatively, sympatric speciation is more like two roommates becoming different people even though they live in the same house. In this case, the species share a habitat but evolve separately, often due to differences in feeding habits or mate preferences.

These processes rely heavily on prezygotic and postzygotic barriers, which are crucial in maintaining the identity of evolving species. The intricate dance between these barriers and the environment eventually leads to the beautiful complexity of life around us.
Reproductive Isolation
Like a social bubble for species, reproductive isolation keeps genetic material within each species' bubble intact and separate from others. This is the overarching theme that encompasses both prezygotic and postzygotic barriers and serves as a safeguard for species identity.

At its core, reproductive isolation ensures that a species' gene pool remains unaltered by outside genetic influences. Whether through timing, behavior, physical incompatibilities, or post-fertilization failures, these isolation mechanisms serve the same purpose: maintaining genetic integrity and enabling speciation.

Indeed, reproductive isolation is a pivotal element in the story of life's diversity. Without it, the crisp edges of what defines a species would blur, and the evolutionary experiment might not be as varied and vibrant as it is today.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Achondroplasia is a dominant trait that causes a characteristic form of dwarfism. In a survey of 50,000 births, five infants with achondroplasia were identified. Three of the affected infants had affected parents, while two had normal parents. Calculate the mutation rate for achondroplasia and express the rate as the number of mutant genes per given number of gametes.

In a population that meets the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium assumptions, 81% of the individuals are homozygous for a recessive allele. What percentage of the individuals would be expected to be heterozygous for this locus in the next generation?

Consider rare disorders in a population caused by an autosomal recessive mutation. From the frequencies of the disorder in the population given, calculate the percentage of heterozygous carriers. (a) 0.0064 (b) 0.000081 (c) 0.09 (d) 0.01 (e) 0.10

A form of dwarfism known as Ellis-van Creveld syndrome was first discovered in the late 1930 s, when Richard Ellis and Simon van Creveld shared a train compartment on the way to a pediatrics meeting. In the course of conversation, they discovered that they each had a patient with this syndrome. They published a description of the syndrome in 1940. Affected individuals have a short-limbed form of dwarfism and often have defects of the lips and teeth, and polydactyly (extra fingers). The largest pedigree for the condition was reported in an Old Order Amish population in eastern Pennsylvania by Victor McKusick and his colleagues (1964). In that community, about 5 per 1000 births are affected, and in the population of 8000, the observed frequency is 2 per 1000. All affected individuals have unaffected parents, and all affected cases can trace their ancestry to Samuel King and his wife, who arrived in the area in 1774. It is known that neither King nor his wife was affected with the disorder. There are no cases of the disorder in other Amish communities, such as those in Ohio or Indiana. (a) From the information provided, derive the most likely mode of inheritance of this disorder. Using the Hardy-Weinberg law, calculate the frequency of the mutant allele in the population and the frequency of heterozygotes, assuming Hardy-Weinberg conditions. (b) What is the most likely explanation for the high frequency of the disorder in the Pennsylvania Amish community and its absence in other Amish communities?

Price et al. (1999. J. Bacteriol. 181: 2358-2362) conducted a genetic study of the toxin transport protein (PA) of Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium that causes anthrax in humans. Within the 2294-nucleotide gene in 26 strains they identified five point mutations-two missense and three synonyms-among different isolates. Necropsy samples from an anthrax outbreak in 1979 revealed a novel missense mutation and five unique nucleotide changes among ten victims. The authors concluded that these data indicate little or no horizontal transfer between different B. anthracis strains. (a) Which types of nucleotide changes (missense or synonyms) cause amino acid changes? (b) What is meant by horizontal transfer? (c) On what basis did the authors conclude that evidence of horizontal transfer is absent from their data?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free