Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A farmer plants transgenic Bt corn that is genetically modified to produce its own insecticide. Of the corn borer larvae feeding on these Bt crop plants, only 10 percent survive unless they have at least one copy of the dominant resistance allele \(B\) that confers resistance to the Bt insecticide. When the farmer first plants Bt corn, the frequency of the \(B\) resistance allele in the corn borer population is \(0.02 .\) What will be the frequency of the resistance allele after one generation of corn borers have fed on Bt corn?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: After one generation of feeding on Bt corn, the frequency of the resistance allele "B" in the corn borer population is approximately 0.1736 or 17.36%.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the initial allele frequencies

The problem states that the initial frequency of the resistance allele 'B' is 0.02. Since the 'B' allele is dominant, we are given that 10% of corn borer larvae survive if they have at least one copy of this allele. The remaining 90% of the larvae that do not have the resistance allele die off. Let 'b' represent the non-resistant allele. Given that there are only two alleles in the population, the frequency of the non-resistant allele 'b' is 1 - 0.02 = 0.98.
02

Determine initial genotype frequencies using Hardy-Weinberg principle

According to the Hardy-Weinberg principle, the genotype frequencies can be found using the equation: \(p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1\), where p represents the frequency of one allele and q represents the frequency of the other allele. In our case, p = B and q = b. \(BB\) frequency = \((0.02)^2 = 0.0004\) \(Bb\) frequency = \(2(0.02)(0.98) = 0.0392\) \(bb\) frequency = \((0.98)^2 = 0.9604\)
03

Evaluate the next generation's allele frequency after the selective pressure

In the next generation, only 10% of the non-resistant larvae (\(bb\)) survive after feeding on the Bt corn. So the new frequency of \(bb\) genotype is reduced to 10% of its initial value, which is 0.1 × 0.9604 = 0.09604. Now we can update the genotype frequencies to account for the selection pressure: New \(BB\) frequency = 0.0004 New \(Bb\) frequency = 0.0392 New \(bb\) frequency = 0.09604 The total frequencies should still sum up to 1, so we can normalize the frequencies: Normalized \(BB\) frequency = \(\frac{0.0004}{0.0004 + 0.0392 + 0.09604} = 0.0035\) Normalized \(Bb\) frequency = \(\frac{0.0392}{0.0004 + 0.0392 + 0.09604} = 0.3402\) Normalized \(bb\) frequency = \(\frac{0.09604}{0.0004 + 0.0392 + 0.09604} = 0.6563\)
04

Calculate the frequency of allele 'B' after selection

To find the frequency of resistance allele 'B' after one generation, we can use the genotype frequencies as follows: New 'B' frequency = (2 * Normalized \(BB\) frequency + Normalized \(Bb\) frequency) / 2 = \((2*0.0035+0.3402)/2 = 0.1736\) So, after one generation of corn borers feeding on Bt corn, the frequency of resistance allele 'B' in the population will be around 0.1736 or 17.36%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are the two groups of reproductive isolating mechanisms? Which of these is regarded as more efficient, and why?

Describe how populations with substantial genetic differences can form. What is the role of natural selection?

A form of dwarfism known as Ellis-van Creveld syndrome was first discovered in the late 1930 s, when Richard Ellis and simon van Creveld shared a train compartment on the way to a pediatrics meeting. In the course of conversation, they discovered that they each had a patient with this syndrome. They published a description of the syndrome in \(1940 .\) Individuals with this syndrome have a short-limbed form of dwarfism and often have defects of the lips and teeth, and polydactyly (extra fingers). The largest pedigree for the condition was reported in an Old Order Amish population in eastern Pennsylvania by Victor McKusick and his colleagues \((1964) .\) In that population of \(8000,\) the observed frequency is 2 per \(1000 .\) In all cases, parents of children with the syndrome were unaffected, and all cases can be traced to Samuel King and his wife, who arrived in the area in \(1774 .\) It is known that neither King nor his wife was affected with the disorder. There are no cases of the disorder in other Amish communities, such as those in Ohio or Indiana. (a) From the information provided, derive the most likely mode of inheritance of this disorder. Using the Hardy-Weinberg law, calculate the frequency of the mutant allele in the population and the frequency of heterozygotes, assuming Hardy-Weinberg conditions. (b) What is the most likely explanation for the high frequency of the disorder in the Pennsylvania Amish community and its absence in other Amish communities?

Price et al. \([(1999) . \text { J. Bacteriol. } 181: 2358-2362]\) conducted a genetic study of the toxin transport protein (PA) of Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium that causes anthrax in humans. Within the 2294 -nucleotide gene in 26 strains they identified five point mutations- two missense and three synonyms-among different isolates. Necropsy samples from an anthrax outbreak in 1979 revealed a novel missense mutation and five unique nucleotide changes among ten victims. The authors concluded that these data indicate little or no horizontal transfer between different B. anthracis strains. (a) Which types of nucleotide changes (missense or synonyms) cause amino acid changes? (b) What is meant by "horizontal transfer"? (c) On what basis did the authors conclude that evidence of horizontal transfer is absent from their data?

In a population where only the total number of individuals wit the dominant phenotype is known, how can you calculate th percentage of carriers and homozygous recessives?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free