Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Describe the value of using twins in the study of questions relating to the relative impact of heredity versus environment.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Twins are often used in such studies because they allow researchers to differentiate between the roles of heredity and environment in specific traits, as they share varying degrees of genetic information and often have similar early-life environments. Comparing and contrasting different types of twins (monozygotic and dizygotic) in various environmental conditions helps researchers disentangle the relative contributions of heredity and environment, ultimately deepening our understanding of human development and behavior.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to Heredity and Environment

Heredity deals with the influence of genes on a person's traits, whereas environment refers to all external factors, such as upbringing and experiences, that can affect a person's development and behavior. Researchers have long been interested in understanding the relative importance of these two factors in determining human characteristics, including personality, intelligence, and susceptibility to certain diseases.
02

Types of Twins and Their Significance

Twins can be classified into two types: monozygotic (identical) twins and dizygotic (fraternal) twins. Monozygotic twins come from a single fertilized egg that splits into two, resulting in genetically identical individuals with almost 100% shared genes. Dizygotic twins, on the other hand, come from two separate fertilized eggs, making them genetically similar to regular siblings, sharing about 50% of their genes. The study of twins is valuable because it allows researchers to differentiate between the roles of heredity and environment in specific traits since twins often share the same environment in early life.
03

Monozygotic Twins in Heredity vs. Environment Studies

Monozygotic twins are especially valuable in studies of heredity and environment because of their identical genetic makeup. If identical twins raised together have similar outcomes or traits, it suggests that heredity plays a significant role in these traits. To further isolate the effects of the environment, researchers may also study identical twins who were separated at birth – known as twin-adoption studies. If identical twins raised in different environments still display strong similarities, it is evidence that heredity has a more significant influence on those traits.
04

Twin Studies and the Role of Shared Environment

By comparing monozygotic and dizygotic twins raised together or apart, researchers can also determine the role of shared environment in shaping traits. If dizygotic twins raised together exhibit strong similarities, it indicates that shared environment plays an essential role in those traits. Conversely, if monozygotic twins raised apart are not as similar as those raised together, it also points to the influence of the shared environment during the development of traits.
05

Conclusion

In summary, twins are a valuable resource for researchers studying the effects of heredity and environment on human traits and behaviors since they share varying degrees of genetic information and, often, similar environments. By comparing and contrasting different types of twins in various environmental conditions, researchers can disentangle the relative contributions of heredity and environment to traits and deepen our understanding of human development and behavior.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Height in humans depends on the additive action of genes. Assume that this trait is controlled by the four loci \(\mathrm{R}, \mathrm{S}, \mathrm{T}\) and \(\mathrm{U}\) and that environmental effects are negligible. Instead of additive versus nonadditive alleles, assume that additive and partially additive alleles exist. Additive alleles contribute two units, and partially additive alleles contribute one unit to height. (a) Can two individuals of moderate height produce offspring that are much taller or shorter than either parent? If so, how? (b) If an individual with the minimum height specified by these genes marries an individual of intermediate or moderate height, will any of their children be taller than the tall parent? Why or why not?

A 3 -inch plant was crossed with a 15 -inch plant, and all \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) plants were 9 inches. The \(F_{2}\) plants exhibited a "normal distribution," with heights of \(3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,\) and 15 inches. (a) What ratio will constitute the "normal distribution" in the \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) ? (b) What will be the outcome if the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) plants are testcrossed with plants that are homozygous for all nonadditive alleles?

Erma and Harvey were a compatible barnyard pair, but a curious sight. Harvey's tail was only \(6 \mathrm{cm}\) long, while Erma's was \(30 \mathrm{cm} .\) Their \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) piglet offspring all grew tails that were \(18 \mathrm{cm}\) When inbred, an \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) generation resulted in many piglets (Erma and Harvey's grandpigs), whose tails ranged in \(4-\mathrm{cm}\) intervals from 6 to \(30 \mathrm{cm}(6,10,14,18,22,26, \text { and } 30) .\) Most had \(18-\mathrm{cm}\) tails, while \(1 / 64\) had \(6-\mathrm{cm}\) tails and \(1 / 64\) had \(30-\mathrm{cm}\) tails. (a) Explain how these tail lengths were inherited by describing the mode of inheritance, indicating how many gene pairs were at work, and designating the genotypes of Harvey, Erma, and their 18 -cm-tail offspring. (b) If one of the \(18-\mathrm{cm} \mathrm{F}_{1}\) pigs is mated with one of the \(6-\mathrm{cm}\) \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) pigs, what phenotypic ratio will be predicted if many offspring resulted? Diagram the cross.

If one is attempting to determine the influence of genes or the environment on phenotypic variation, inbred strains with individuals of a relatively homogeneous or constant genetic background are often used. Variation observed between different inbred strains reared in a constant or homogeneous environment would likely be caused by genetic factors. What would be the source of variation observed among members of the same inbred strain reared under varying environmental conditions?

Corn plants from a test plot are measured, and the distribution of heights at \(10-\mathrm{cm}\) intervals is recorded in the following table: $$\begin{array}{cc}\text { Height }(\mathrm{cm}) & \text { Plants (no.) } \\\100 & 20 \\\110 & 60 \\\120 & 90 \\\130 & 130 \\\140 & 180 \\\150 & 120 \\\160 & 70 \\\170 & 50 \\\180 & 40\end{array}$$ Calculate (a) the mean height, (b) the variance, (c) the standard deviation, and (d) the standard error of the mean. Plot a rough graph of plant height against frequency. Do the values represent a normal distribution? Based on your calculations, how would you assess the variation within this population?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free