Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Genes in their natural state cannot be patented. This policy allows research and use of natural products for the common good. What argument might be presented in favor of patenting genes or gene products?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The potential benefits of allowing gene patents include promoting research and development, providing economic incentives for innovation, protecting intellectual property rights, and facilitating the development of targeted treatments.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

To begin with, let's understand the concept of patenting and why it is important. A patent is a form of intellectual property that grants the exclusive right to the holder to make, use, or sell the invention for a limited period. Now, let's formulate an argument in favor of patenting genes or gene products.
02

1. Promoting research and development

One of the main arguments in favor of patenting genes is that it can promote research and development in the biotechnology industry. By granting exclusive rights to a gene, companies and researchers have an incentive to invest time and resources into understanding the gene and its potential uses. This can lead to advancements in medicine, agriculture, and other areas that depend on genetic research.
03

2. Economic incentives

Allowing gene patents can provide economic incentives for innovation. If a company can patent a gene or gene product, it can potentially generate revenue through licensing fees or by selling the patented technology. This revenue can be used to fund further research, hire additional staff, and contribute to the overall growth of the biotechnology industry.
04

3. Protection of intellectual property

Patenting genes or gene products can help protect the intellectual property rights of the inventor. With a patent, the inventor can legally prevent others from using, copying, or selling the invention without permission. This ensures that the inventor is fairly compensated for their innovation and can control the use of their invention. In the case of gene patents, it may also help maintain high ethical standards in the use of genetic technologies.
05

4. Development of targeted treatments

By allowing the patenting of genes or gene products, researchers and pharmaceutical companies can work to develop targeted treatments for various diseases and conditions. When a specific gene or gene product is patented, it can be explored in-depth to understand its role in disease development and progression. This knowledge can be used to develop targeted therapies, such as personalized medicine, that are tailored to an individual's unique genetic makeup. Overall, the argument in favor of patenting genes or gene products is based on the potential benefits it may bring to research and development, economic incentives, protection of intellectual property rights, and the development of targeted treatments. However, it is important to strike a balance between these benefits and the ethical considerations of patenting naturally occurring genes to ensure that the common good is maintained.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Once DNA is separated on a gel, it is often desirable to gain some idea of its informational content. How might this be done?

An unapproved form of gene therapy, known as enhancement gene therapy, can create considerable ethical dilemmas. Why?

(a) Would you agree with Judge Sweet's ruling to invalidate the patenting of the \(B R C A 1\) and \(B R C A 2\) genes? If you were asked to judge the patenting of the direct-to-consumer test for the \(B R C A 1\) and \(B R C A 2\) genes, how would you rule? (b) \(\mathrm{J}\). Craig Venter has filed a patent application for his "firstever human made life form." This patent is designed to cover the genome of \(M .\) genitalium. Would your ruling for Venter's "organism" be different from Judge Sweet's ruling on patenting of the \(B R C A 1\) and \(B R C A 2\) genes?

Would you have your genome sequenced, if the price was affordable? Why or why not? If you answered yes, would you make your genome sequence publicly available? How might such information be misused?

The family of a sixth-grade boy in Palo Alto, California, was informed by school administrators that he would have to transfer out of his middle school because they believed his mutation of the \(C F T R,\) which does not produce any symptoms associated with cystic fibrosis, posed a risk to other students at the school who have cystic fibrosis. After missing 11 days of school, a settlement was reached to have the boy return to school. Based on what you know about GINA, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, what ethical problems might you associate with this example?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free