Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Comparisons between human and chimpanzee genomes indicate that a gene that may function as a wild type or normal gene in one primate may function as a disease-causing gene in another (The Chimpanzee Sequence and Analysis Consortium, Nature, \(437: 69-87,2005\) ). For instance, the \(P P A R G\) locus (regulator of adipocyte differentiation) is associated with type 2 diabetes in humans but functions as a wild-type gene in chimps. What factors might cause this apparent contradiction? Would you consider such apparent contradictions to be rare or common? What impact might such findings have on the use of comparative genomics to identify and design therapies for disease-causing genes in humans?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Factors causing differences in the function of the same gene between humans and chimpanzees include genetic variations, differences in gene expression, gene-environment interactions, and changes in protein function. These differences present both challenges and opportunities for comparative genomics. They highlight the need for caution in translating findings from one species to another while also providing valuable insights into the genetic underpinnings of human diseases and the evolutionary mechanisms underlying gene function and regulation. Comparative genomics can still be a powerful tool for identifying disease-causing genes and designing therapies, provided that careful consideration is given to the potential differences in gene function between species.

Step by step solution

01

To begin, it will be helpful to understand that the PPARγ locus represents a gene that has a different function in humans as compared to chimpanzees. In humans, it is associated with type 2 diabetes, whereas in chimpanzees it functions as a wild-type gene. This indicates that the same gene can have different consequences in closely related species. #Step 2: Factors causing differences in gene function#

The differences in functions of the same gene between humans and chimpanzees can be attributed to several factors, such as genetic variations, differences in gene expression, gene-environment interactions, and changes in protein function. For instance, genetic variations in the human population might cause the gene to be associated with diseases like type 2 diabetes in some individuals, while in those without such variations, it functions as a wild-type gene. Similarly, evolutionary pressures, diet, or lifestyle may also influence gene function differently in humans and chimpanzees. #Step 3: Frequency of apparent contradictions#
02

It is difficult to provide a definitive answer regarding the frequency of such contradictions, as it largely depends on the conservation and divergence of genes between the two species. However, since humans and chimpanzees share more than 98% of their DNA sequence, such apparent contradictions may be considered relatively rare, with most genes performing similar functions in both species. Nonetheless, the remaining small percentage can result in critical differences in disease risk, susceptibility, and gene function. #Step 4: Impact on comparative genomics for therapy development#

The discovery of such contradictions presents both challenges and opportunities for comparative genomics. On one hand, it highlights the need for caution in directly translating findings from one species to another, as the same gene might behave differently in humans and chimpanzees. On the other hand, these differences provide valuable insights into the genetic underpinnings of human diseases, as well as the evolutionary mechanisms underlying gene function and regulation. In this context, comparative genomics can still be a powerful tool for identifying disease-causing genes and designing therapies, provided that careful consideration is given to the potential differences in gene function between species.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

PPARγ Locus
The Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARγ) locus is critical in governing fat cell differentiation and insulin sensitivity.
Genetic variations in the PPARγ gene can lead to its association with type 2 diabetes in humans, despite being wild-type in chimpanzees.
This difference exemplifies how a single gene can influence health outcomes across related species, underpinning personalized medicine approaches that focus on individual genetic profiles.
Genetic Variations
Genetic variations, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, deletions, and structural variants, contribute to the diversity within a species.
These variations can affect gene function and are often implicated in disease susceptibility, including metabolic disorders like type 2 diabetes.
Understanding these variations allows researchers to identify potential targets for disease intervention and prevention.
Gene-Environment Interactions
Gene-environment interactions describe how environmental factors such as diet, exercise, and exposure to toxins can influence the expression and function of genes.
These interactions are particularly relevant in the context of complex diseases like type 2 diabetes, where both genetics and lifestyle play a role.
By studying these interactions, scientists can gain insights into preventive strategies and more personalized approaches to treatment.
Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 diabetes is a chronic condition characterized by insulin resistance and high blood sugar levels.
Genetic factors, including variations in the PPARγ gene, interact with environmental factors to influence an individual's risk.
This disease exemplifies the importance of understanding both genetic predispositions and lifestyle factors in managing and preventing health conditions.
Therapies for Disease-Causing Genes
Therapeutic strategies targeting disease-causing genes aim to correct or mitigate the effects of genetic variations.
These therapies may include gene editing, gene replacement, or drugs that modulate gene expression.
With advancements in genomics, personalized medicine is becoming increasingly feasible, emphasizing the need for tailored treatments based on a person's genetic makeup.
Evolutionary Mechanisms
Evolutionary mechanisms, such as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift, shape the genetic landscape of populations over time.
These processes can lead to the divergence in gene function between species, such as humans and chimpanzees.
Comparative genomics harnesses these principles to understand gene function and health, informing both evolutionary biology and medical science.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Compare and contrast whole-genome shotgun sequencing to a map-based cloning approach.

What is bioinformatics, and why is this discipline essential for studying genomes? Provide two examples of bioinformatics applications.

Systems biology models the complex networks of interacting genes, proteins, and other molecules that contribute to human genetic diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, and hypertension. These interactomes show the contribution of each piece towards the whole and where diseases overlap, and provide models for drug discovery and development. Describe some tions (Roy et al., 2008 ). In some cases, closely related homologs may engender completely different classes of proteins (enzymes). Consider the 3 D structure of two proteins with 60 percent homology with entirely different functions. Explain how different functions may evolve by discussing the position of the homologous amino acid track, its relation to nonhomologous tracks, and the role that chaperones (Chapter 14) may play in determining protein function. of the differences that might be seen in the interactomes of normal and cancerous cells taken from the same tissue, and explain how these differences could lead to drugs specifically targeted against cancer cells.

In this chapter, we focused on the analysis of genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes and considered important applications and findings from these endeavors. At the same time, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explanations given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions: (a) How do we know which contigs are part of the same chromosome? (b) How do we know if a genomic DNA sequence contains a protein-coding gene? (c) What evidence supports the concept that humans share substantial sequence similarities and gene functional similarities with model organisms? (d) How can proteomics identify differences between the number of protein- coding genes predicted for a genome and the number of proteins expressed by a genome? (e) What evidence indicates that gene families result from gene duplication events? (f) How have microarrays demonstrated that, although all cells of an organism have the same genome, some genes are expressed in almost all cells, whereas other genes show celland tissue-specific expression?

In what way will the discipline called metagenomics contribute to human health and welfare?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free