Question

In this chapter, we focused on the analysis of genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes and considered important applications and findings from these endeavors. At the same time, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explanations given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions: (a) How do we know which contigs are part of the same chromosome? (b) How do we know if a genomic DNA sequence contains a protein-coding gene? (c) What evidence supports the concept that humans share substantial sequence similarities and gene functional similarities with model organisms? (d) How can proteomics identify differences between the number of protein- coding genes predicted for a genome and the number of proteins expressed by a genome? (e) What evidence indicates that gene families result from gene duplication events? (f) How have microarrays demonstrated that, although all cells of an organism have the same genome, some genes are expressed in almost all cells, whereas other genes show celland tissue-specific expression?

Short answer

Answer: Researchers can determine which contigs are part of the same chromosome through genome sequencing and mapping techniques, such as pairwise end sequencing, genetic and physical mapping, and comparative genomics. Protein-coding genes can be identified by searching for open reading frames (ORFs), the presence of promoter regions and additional regulatory sequences, and comparing the DNA sequence with known protein-coding sequences from other organisms through sequence similarity searches (e.g., using BLAST).

Step-by-step solution

Answer (a)

We can determine which contigs are part of the same chromosome through genome sequencing and mapping techniques, such as pairwise end sequencing, genetic and physical mapping, and comparative genomics. Pairwise end sequencing involves sequencing both ends of a DNA fragment and aligning the sequences, searching for overlaps to identify contigs that are part of the same chromosome. Genetic mapping involves finding correlations between known genetic markers and the contigs, enabling researchers to order contigs along the chromosome. Physical mapping involves using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or other cytogenetic techniques to visualize the location of the contigs in the chromosomes. Comparing the genomic data of different species can also help to determine contig order through conserved synteny.

Answer (b)

We can determine if a genomic DNA sequence contains a protein-coding gene by searching for open reading frames (ORFs), which are sequences of DNA with a start codon (ATG) followed by a sequence that does not contain any stop codons (TAA, TAG, or TGA) in the same reading frame, and then a stop codon. The presence of an ORF indicates a potential protein-coding gene. Other evidence includes the presence of promoter regions and additional regulatory sequences. Furthermore, comparing the DNA sequence with known protein-coding sequences from other organisms through sequence similarity searches (e.g., using BLAST) can help identify protein-coding genes.

Answer (c)

The evidence supporting the concept that humans share substantial sequence similarities and gene functional similarities with model organisms includes data from comparative genomics studies, where the genomes of different organisms are compared. These studies have shown that a significant proportion of human genes have homologs in model organisms, such as mice, fruit flies, and yeast. Moreover, many gene functional studies have demonstrated that the genes shared between humans and these model organisms often have similar functions and participate in conserved biological pathways.

Answer (d)

Proteomics can identify differences between the number of protein-coding genes predicted for a genome and the number of proteins expressed by a genome by examining the entire complement of proteins in a cell or tissue (the proteome). Using techniques such as mass spectrometry or protein microarrays, researchers can identify and quantify thousands of proteins simultaneously, providing an accurate count of proteins being expressed in a given cell type or tissue. This experimental proteome data can then be compared to the predicted proteome from genomic data to identify discrepancies, such as alternative splicing events, post-translational modifications, or mis-annotations.

Answer (e)

Evidence indicating that gene families result from gene duplication events includes the presence of paralogous genes, which are genes within the same species that arose through duplication. Comparative genomics studies have shown that many paralogs are organized in clusters along chromosomes, suggesting that they originated from local duplication events. Moreover, sequence analysis can reveal that duplicated genes often share a high degree of sequence similarity, supporting the idea that they originated from a common ancestor gene. Additionally, functional analysis can show that the members of a gene family often share similar functions or participate in related biological pathways.

Answer (f)

Microarrays have demonstrated that, although all cells of an organism have the same genome, some genes are expressed in almost all cells, whereas other genes show cell- and tissue-specific expression. Microarrays enable the parallel analysis of gene expression levels for thousands of genes in a single experiment. By comparing gene expression profiles from different cell types and tissues, researchers have discovered that some genes, called housekeeping genes, are expressed in almost all cell types, indicating that they are essential for basic cellular processes. In contrast, other genes display tissue- or cell-specific expression, indicating that they have specialized functions in particular cell types or developmental stages.