Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What properties demonstrate the lac repressor to be a protein? Describe the evidence that it indeed serves as a repressor within the operon system.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The lac repressor has several properties that support its classification as a protein, including its structure (composed of polypeptide chains), molecular weight (around 150 kDa), amino acid composition (string of amino acids forming its primary structure), and specific binding activity towards the operator region of the lac operon. The evidence for its role as a repressor within the operon system includes binding to the operator region, inhibition of transcription, inducer-mediated release, and genetic evidence from loss-of-function or gain-of-function mutations.

Step by step solution

01

Properties of the lac repressor

The lac repressor is a protein with several properties that support its classification as a protein. These properties include: 1. Its structure: The lac repressor is composed of polypeptide chains, which are characteristic of proteins. 2. Molecular weight: The lac repressor has a molecular weight of around 150 kDa, which is consistent with the size of proteins. 3. Amino acid composition: Like other proteins, the lac repressor is composed of a string of amino acids, which form its primary structure. 4. Specific activity: The lac repressor displays specific binding activity towards the operator region of the lac operon, which implies a high degree of molecular specificity, a characteristic feature of proteins.
02

Evidence for lac repressor's role as a repressor in the operon system

The evidence for the role of the lac repressor as a repressor within the operon system includes: 1. Binding to the operator region: The lac repressor binds to the operator region of the lac operon in the absence of lactose, which demonstrates its role in controlling gene expression. 2. Inhibition of transcription: The binding of the lac repressor to the operator region physically blocks the access of RNA polymerase to the promoter region, thereby repressing the transcription of the lac operon genes. 3. Inducer-mediated release: The presence of an inducer molecule, such as allolactose or isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), leads to the release of the lac repressor from the operator region, allowing transcription to proceed. This conditional repression is evidence of the lac repressor's role as a repressor. 4. Genetic evidence: Mutations in the lac repressor can lead to a loss of repression (loss-of-function mutations) or constitutive repression (gain-of-function mutations), further substantiating its role as a repressor in the operon system.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Predict the effect on the inducibility of the \(\operatorname{lac}\) operon of a mutation that disrupts the function of (a) the crp gene, which encodes the CAP protein, and (b) the CAP-binding site within the promoter.

The SOS repair genes in \(E\). coli (discussed in Chapter 15 ) are negatively regulated by the lexA gene product, called the LexA (a) Describe two different mutations that would result in a \(u v r A\) constitutive phenotype. Indicate the actual genotypes involved. (b) Outline a series of genetic experiments that would use partial diploid strains to determine which of the two possible mutations you have isolated.

A bacterial operon is responsible for the production of the biosynthetic enzymes needed to make the hypothetical amino acid tisophane (tis). The operon is regulated by a separate gene, \(R,\) deletion of which causes the loss of enzyme synthesis. In the wild-type condition, when tis is present, no enzymes are made; in the absence of tis, the enzymes are made. Mutations in the operator gene (O) result in repression regardless of the presence of tis. Is the operon under positive or negative control? Propose a model for (a) repression of the genes in the presence of tis in wild-type cells and (b) the mutations.

Both attenuation of the \(t r p\) operon in \(E\). coli and riboswitches in B. subtilis rely on changes in the secondary structure of the leader regions of mRNA to regulate gene expression. Compare and contrast the specific mechanisms in these two types of regulation.

Neelaredoxin is a 15 -kDa protein that is a gene product common in anaerobic prokaryotes. It has superoxide-scavenging activity, and it is constitutively expressed. In addition, its expression is not further induced during its exposure to \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) or \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}\) (Silva, G., et al. \(2001 .\) J. Bacteriol. \(183: 4413-4420\) ). What do the terms constitutively expressed and induced mean in terms of neelaredoxin synthesis?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free