Chapter 16: Problem 9
What properties demonstrate the lac repressor to be a protein? Describe the evidence that it indeed serves as a repressor within the operon system.
Chapter 16: Problem 9
What properties demonstrate the lac repressor to be a protein? Describe the evidence that it indeed serves as a repressor within the operon system.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freePredict the effect on the inducibility of the \(\operatorname{lac}\) operon of a mutation that disrupts the function of (a) the crp gene, which encodes the CAP protein, and (b) the CAP-binding site within the promoter.
The SOS repair genes in \(E\). coli (discussed in Chapter 15 ) are negatively regulated by the lexA gene product, called the LexA (a) Describe two different mutations that would result in a \(u v r A\) constitutive phenotype. Indicate the actual genotypes involved. (b) Outline a series of genetic experiments that would use partial diploid strains to determine which of the two possible mutations you have isolated.
A bacterial operon is responsible for the production of the biosynthetic enzymes needed to make the hypothetical amino acid tisophane (tis). The operon is regulated by a separate gene, \(R,\) deletion of which causes the loss of enzyme synthesis. In the wild-type condition, when tis is present, no enzymes are made; in the absence of tis, the enzymes are made. Mutations in the operator gene (O) result in repression regardless of the presence of tis. Is the operon under positive or negative control? Propose a model for (a) repression of the genes in the presence of tis in wild-type cells and (b) the mutations.
Both attenuation of the \(t r p\) operon in \(E\). coli and riboswitches in B. subtilis rely on changes in the secondary structure of the leader regions of mRNA to regulate gene expression. Compare and contrast the specific mechanisms in these two types of regulation.
Neelaredoxin is a 15 -kDa protein that is a gene product common in anaerobic prokaryotes. It has superoxide-scavenging activity, and it is constitutively expressed. In addition, its expression is not further induced during its exposure to \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) or \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}\) (Silva, G., et al. \(2001 .\) J. Bacteriol. \(183: 4413-4420\) ). What do the terms constitutively expressed and induced mean in terms of neelaredoxin synthesis?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.