Chapter 16: Problem 4
Contrast the role of the repressor in an inducible system and in a repressible system.
Chapter 16: Problem 4
Contrast the role of the repressor in an inducible system and in a repressible system.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeAssume that the structural genes of the lac operon have been fused, through recombinant DNA techniques, to the regulatory apparatus of the ara operon. If arabinose is provided in a minimal medium to \(E\). coli carrying this gene fusion, would you expect \(\beta\) -galactosidase to be produced at induced levels? Explain.
In this chapter, we focused on the regulation of gene expression in prokaryotes. Along the way, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explanations given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions? (a) How do we know that bacteria regulate the expression of certain genes in response to the environment? (b) What evidence established that lactose serves as the inducer of a gene whose product is related to lactose metabolism? (c) What led researchers to conclude that a repressor molecule regulates the lac operon? (d) How do we know that the lac repressor is a protein? (e) How do we know that the trp operon is a repressible con- trol system, in contrast to the lac operon, which is an inducible control system?
The SOS repair genes in \(E\). coli (discussed in Chapter 15 ) are negatively regulated by the lexA gene product, called the LexA (a) Describe two different mutations that would result in a \(u v r A\) constitutive phenotype. Indicate the actual genotypes involved. (b) Outline a series of genetic experiments that would use partial diploid strains to determine which of the two possible mutations you have isolated.
A bacterial operon is responsible for the production of the biosynthetic enzymes needed to make the hypothetical amino acid tisophane (tis). The operon is regulated by a separate gene, \(R,\) deletion of which causes the loss of enzyme synthesis. In the wild-type condition, when tis is present, no enzymes are made; in the absence of tis, the enzymes are made. Mutations in the operator gene (O) result in repression regardless of the presence of tis. Is the operon under positive or negative control? Propose a model for (a) repression of the genes in the presence of tis in wild-type cells and (b) the mutations.
Both attenuation of the \(t r p\) operon in \(E\). coli and riboswitches in B. subtilis rely on changes in the secondary structure of the leader regions of mRNA to regulate gene expression. Compare and contrast the specific mechanisms in these two types of regulation.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.