M. Klemke et al. (2001) discovered an interesting coding phenomenon in which
an exon within a neurologic hormone receptor gene in mammals appears to
produce two different protein entities (XL \(\alpha\) s, ALEX). Following is the
DNA sequence of the exon's \(5^{\prime}\) end derived from a rat. The lowercase
letters represent the initial coding portion for the XL \(\alpha\)s protein, and
the uppercase letters indicate the portion where the ALEX entity is initiated.
(For simplicity, and to correspond with the RNA coding dictionary, it is
customary to represent the noncoding, nontemplate strand of the DNA segment.)
\(5^{\prime}-\) gtcccaaccatgcccaccgatcttccgcctgcttctgaagATGCGGGCCCAG
(a) Convert the noncoding DNA sequence to the coding RNA sequence.
(b) Locate the initiator codon within the XL \(\alpha\) segment.
(c) Locate the initiator codon within the ALEX segment. Are the two initiator
codons in frame?
(d) Provide the amino acid sequence for each coding sequence. In the region of
overlap, are the two amino acid sequences the same?
(e) Are there any evolutionary advantages to having the same DNA sequence code
for two protein products? Are there any disadvantages?