Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Substitution RNA editing is known to involve either C-to-U or A-to-I conversions. What common chemical event accounts for each?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The common chemical event in C-to-U and A-to-I Substitution RNA editing is the process of deamination, where an amino group (NH2) is removed and replaced with a carbonyl group (C=O).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Substitution RNA editing

Substitution RNA editing refers to the post-transcriptional modification of RNA molecules, where specific nucleotide bases are changed to different bases. In this case, we are focusing on Cytosine (C) being converted to Uracil (U) and Adenosine (A) being converted to Inosine (I).
02

C-to-U Conversion

C-to-U conversion involves the deamination of cytosine to form uracil. This process requires an enzyme called "Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like" (APOBEC), which removes an amino group (NH2) from the cytosine base and replaces it with a carbonyl group (C=O). This causes the overall structure of the base to change, effectively converting it from cytosine to uracil.
03

A-to-I Conversion

A-to-I conversion involves the deamination of adenosine to form inosine. This process requires an enzyme called "adenosine deaminase acting on RNA" (ADAR), which removes an amino group (NH2) from the adenosine base and replaces it with a carbonyl group (C=O) just like in the C-to-U conversion. This results in the formation of inosine, which has a similar structure to guanosine and is recognized as guanosine during translation.
04

Common Chemical Event

The common chemical event that occurs in both C-to-U and A-to-I conversions is the process of deamination. In both cases, the conversion involves the removal of an amino group (NH2) and replacing it with a carbonyl group (C=O). This structural change results in the conversion of the original base to a new one, allowing for changes in the functionality of the RNA molecule.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

C-to-U Conversion
The process of C-to-U conversion is a fascinating example of how a single molecular change can have a significant impact on the function of an RNA molecule. In simple terms, cytosine (C) is chemically modified to become uracil (U) through the removal of an amino group (NH2), a process known as deamination. An enzyme called APOBEC is the artist behind this transformation, meticulously replacing the removed NH2 with a carbonyl group (=O).

Consider a scenario where a single letter is changed in a word, altering its meaning entirely. That's essentially what happens during C-to-U conversion. The RNA molecule, which is a sequence of genetic 'words', undergoes a slight revision that can lead to significant changes in the protein that is ultimately produced. This post-transcriptional modification showcases nature's precision in editing the genetic code after it has been transcribed from DNA to RNA.
A-to-I Conversion
Much like the C-to-U conversion, A-to-I conversion is another type of substitution editing that alters the identity of a nucleotide base. Here, adenosine (A) is deaminated to become inosine (I) with the assistance of an enzyme called ADAR. The ADAR enzyme carefully exchanges the amino group on adenosine with a carbonyl group, producing inosine.

Inosine pairs with cytosine rather than thymine or uracil. As a result, during protein synthesis, the ribosome interprets inosine as if it were guanosine (G). This switch can have a profound effect, as it changes the codon in the mRNA, which may in turn change the amino acid sequence of the protein encoded by this mRNA. It's a testament to the versatility of RNA editing in expanding genetic diversity without changing the underlying DNA sequence.
Deamination
Deamination is the common thread connecting both C-to-U and A-to-I conversions. It represents a chemical event where an amino group is removed from a nucleotide base. In both types of RNA editing, an enzyme—APOBEC for C-to-U and ADAR for A-to-I—executes this precise edit.

The replacement of the amino group with a carbonyl group changes the base's hydrogen bonding pattern, which can alter base pairing during DNA replication or RNA transcription. This intricate process highlights how a subtle chemical alteration can significantly influence the genetic instructions within a cell.
Post-Transcriptional Modification
Post-transcriptional modification is a collective term for various molecular changes that RNA undergoes after it is transcribed from DNA. It includes a broad landscape of events such as splicing, capping, polyadenylation, and editing through base conversions like C-to-U and A-to-I.

These modifications are crucial for the cell, as they often determine the fate and function of the RNA molecules. For instance, splicing removes non-coding regions from the RNA, and polyadenylation signals for the end of the transcript and prepares it for export from the nucleus. Through post-transcriptional modifications, cells can fine-tune gene expression, and adapt to various conditions, ensuring that each protein is made at the right place and time.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A glycine residue is in position 210 of the tryptophan synthetase enzyme of wild-type \(E .\) coli. If the codon specifying glycine is GGA, how many single- base substitutions will result in an amino acid substitution at position \(210 ?\) What are they? How many will result if the wild-type codon is GGU?

Describe the role of two forms of RNA editing that lead to changes in the size and sequence of pre-mRNAs. Briefly describe several examples of each form of editing, including their impact on respective protein products.

In this chapter, we focused on the genetic code and the transcription of genetic information stored in DNA into complementary RNA molecules. Along the way, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explanations given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions: (a) Why did geneticists believe, even before direct experimental evidence was obtained, that the genetic code would turn out to be composed of triplet sequences and be nonoverlapping? Experimentally, how were these suppositions shown to be correct? (b) What experimental evidence provided the initial insights into the compositions of codons encoding specific amino acids? (c) How were the specific sequences of triplet codes determined experimentally? (d) How were the experimentally derived triplet codon assignments verified in studies using bacteriophage MS2? (e) What evidence do we have that the expression of the information encoded in DNA involves an RNA intermediate? (f) How do we know that the initial transcript of a eukaryotic gene contains noncoding sequences that must be removed before accurate translation into proteins can occur?

In their studies of frameshift mutations, Crick, Barnett, Brenner, and Watts- Tobin found that either three "pluses" or three "minuses" restored the correct reading frame. (a) Assuming the code is a triplet, what effect would the addition or loss of six nucleotides have on the reading frame? (b) If the code were a sextuplet (consisting of six nucleotides), would the reading frame be restored by the addition or loss of three, six, or nine nucleotides?

An early proposal by George Gamow in 1954 regarding the genetic code considered the possibility that DNA served directly as the template for polypeptide synthesis. In eukaryotes, what difficulties would such a system pose? What observations and theoretical considerations argue against such a proposal?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free