Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What was the initial evidence for the existence of mRNA?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The key experiments that provided initial evidence for the existence of mRNA as an intermediary molecule between DNA and proteins were conducted by Sidney Brenner, François Jacob, and Matthew Meselson in 1961 and by Elliot Volkin and Lazarus Astrachan in 1956. Brenner, Jacob, and Meselson's work involved using bacteriophages to observe the role of RNA in protein synthesis, while Volkin and Astrachan's work focused on the discovery of a new, short-lived form of RNA associated with infected bacterial cells.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the central dogma of molecular biology

The central dogma of molecular biology, proposed by Crick in 1958, states that genetic information flows from DNA to RNA and then to proteins. According to this theory, genes (made up of DNA) are transcribed into RNA, and this RNA is then translated into proteins, which carry out various functions in the cell. The hypothesis of an intermediary molecule between DNA and proteins led to the search for messenger RNA (mRNA).
02

Discussing the key experiments

The initial evidence for the existence of mRNA came from various experiments conducted during the 1950s and 1960s. Here we'll focus on two important ones: the experiments by Brenner, Jacob, and Meselson (1961), and the experiments by Volkin and Astrachan (1956).
03

Looking at the work of Brenner, Jacob, and Meselson

Sidney Brenner, François Jacob, and Matthew Meselson conducted experiments in 1961 in which they used bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria) to observe the role of RNA in protein synthesis. They found that after the initial phase of infection (called the "eclipse phase"), during which no new phage particles could be found, the phage genetic material (DNA) was used to create new phage-specific RNA that was then translated into viral proteins. The newly synthesized RNA only carried the genetic information of the phage, which indicated that it serves as a template for protein production. This was the first direct evidence of mRNA as the intermediary between DNA and proteins.
04

Discussing the work of Volkin and Astrachan

Elliot Volkin and Lazarus Astrachan in 1956 discovered a previously unknown form of RNA that was specifically associated with infected bacterial cells. They found that this new RNA was rapidly synthesized and then degraded during bacteriophage infection. This led them to hypothesize that this RNA could be a short-lived intermediary molecule carrying genetic information from DNA to proteins, which we now know as messenger RNA (mRNA).
05

Concluding the initial evidence for the existence of mRNA

Through the work of scientists like Brenner, Jacob, Meselson, Volkin, and Astrachan, the concept of mRNA as a transient carrier of genetic information between DNA and proteins was developed. These groundbreaking experiments provided the foundation for our current understanding of the central dogma of molecular biology and the crucial role that mRNA plays in the flow of genetic information.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The concept of consensus sequences of DNA was defined in this chapter as sequences that are similar (homologous) in different genes of the same organism or in genes of different organisms. Examples were the Pribnow box and the -35 region in prokaryotes and the TATA-box region in eukaryotes. One study found that among 73 isolates from the virus HIV-Type \(1 \mathrm{C}\) (a major contributor to the AIDS epidemic), a GGGNNNNNCC consensus sequence exists (where \(\mathrm{N}\) equals any nitrogenous base) in the promoter-enhancer region of the \(\mathrm{NF}-\kappa \mathrm{B}\) transcription factor, a cis- acting element that is critical for initiating HIV transcription in human macrophages (Novitsky et al., 2002 ). The authors contend that finding this and other conserved sequences may be of value in designing an AIDS vaccine. What advantages would knowing these consensus sequences confer? Are there disadvantages as a vaccine is designed?

Most proteins have more leucine than histidine residues, but more histidine than tryptophan residues. Correlate the number of codons for these three amino acids with this information.

In this chapter, we focused on the genetic code and the transcription of genetic information stored in DNA into complementary RNA molecules. Along the way, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explanations given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions: (a) Why did geneticists believe, even before direct experimental evidence was obtained, that the genetic code would turn out to be composed of triplet sequences and be nonoverlapping? Experimentally, how were these suppositions shown to be correct? (b) What experimental evidence provided the initial insights into the compositions of codons encoding specific amino acids? (c) How were the specific sequences of triplet codes determined experimentally? (d) How were the experimentally derived triplet codon assignments verified in studies using bacteriophage MS2? (e) What evidence do we have that the expression of the information encoded in DNA involves an RNA intermediate? (f) How do we know that the initial transcript of a eukaryotic gene contains noncoding sequences that must be removed before accurate translation into proteins can occur?

It has been suggested that the present-day triplet genetic code evolved from a doublet code when there were fewer amino acids available for primitive protein synthesis. (a) Can you find any support for the doublet code notion in the existing coding dictionary? (b) The amino acids Ala, Val, Gly, Asp, and Glu are all early members of biosynthetic pathways (Taylor and Coates, 1989 ) and are more evolutionarily conserved than other amino acids (Brooks and Fresco, 2003 ). They therefore probably represent "early" amino acids. Of what significance is this information in terms of the evolution of the genetic code? Also, which base, of the first two, would likely have been the more significant in originally specifying these amino acids? (c) As determined by comparisons of ancient and recently evolved proteins, cysteine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine appear to be late-arriving amino acids. In addition, they are considered to have been absent in the abiotic earth (Miller, 1987 ). All three of these amino acids have only two codons each, while many others, earlier in origin, have more. Is this mere coincidence, or might there be some underlying explanation?

Present an overview of various forms of posttranscriptional processing in eukaryotes. For each, provide an example.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free