Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

WRITE ABOUT A THEME: Organization You have seen many examples of how form fits function at all levels of the biological hierarchy. However, we can imagine forms that would function better than some forms actually found in nature. For example, if the wings of a bird were not formed from its forelimbs, such a hypothetical bird could fly yet also hold objects with its forelimbs. In a short essay (100–150 words), use the concept of “evolution as tinkering” to explain why there are limits to the functionality of forms in nature.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Evolutionary innovation occurs through tinkering, which means the evolution of new forms from pre-existing ones. The constraints allow variation at the species level, hence enhancing biodiversity.

As the evolutionary events are random and limited by several biological and environmental conditions, one can say that evolution is tinkering.

Step by step solution

01

Evolution

Living organisms tend to have varying levels of changes in their morphology, physiology, and behavior over several generations; this is called evolution. Evolution provides better survival chances to the population, which facilitates their sustainability over a prolonged period. Evolution occurs with the incorporated efforts of gene flow, mutation, and natural selection.

02

Limits to evolution

Evolution has its limits. It is majorly limited by the absolute need for evolutionary changes. If a population fails to adapt to the necessary evolutionary changes, the population is less favored and eventually becomes less reproductive.

03

Evolutionary changes and tinkering

Evolution is a process that allows changes in living organisms over an extensive period. But evolution is limited and cannot provide unlimited changes.Several fossils have shown a prolonged duration of morphological stasis, while some show significantly slow evolutionary advancements.

Experts speculate that every species experiences an evolutionary dead-end at a certain point where the species cannot evolve further and experience ecological constrain.

The evolutionary changes are marked by new traits that are formed by the combination of older pre-existing ones. The traits are not created rather formed by recombination of alleles for existing characters. Hence, the evolution is called a tinkering process.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In changing from an “RNA world” to today’s “DNA world,” genetic information must have flowed from RNA to DNA. After reviewing Figures 17.4 and 19.9, suggest how this could have occurred. Does such a flow occur today?

The oxygen revolution changed Earth's environment dramatically. Which of the following took advantage of the presence of free oxygen in the oceans and atmosphere?

(A) the evolution of cellular respiration, which used oxygen to help harvest energy from organic molecules

(B) the persistence of some animal groups in anaerobic habitats

(C) the evolution of photosynthetic pigments that protected early algae from the corrosive effects of oxygen

(D) the evolution of chloroplasts after early protists incorporated photosynthetic cyanobacteria

Suppose that an invertebrate species was lost in a mass extinction caused by a sudden catastrophic event. Would the last appearance of this species in the fossil record necessarily be close to when the extinction actually occurred? Would the answer to this question differ depending on whether the species was common (abundant and widespread) or rare? Explain.

How would the appearance of protocells have represented a key step in the origin of life?

You can estimate quantitative data (fairly precisely) from a graph. The first step is to obtain a conversion factor by measuring along an axis that has a scale. In this case, 25 million years (my; from 60 to 35 million years ago (mya) on the x-axis) is represented by a distance of 7.0 cm. This yields a conversion factor (a ratio) of 25 my/7.0 cm = 3.6 my/cm. To estimate the time period represented by a horizontal bar on this graph, measure the length of that bar in centimeters and multiply that measurement by the conversion factor, 3.6 my/cm. For example, a bar that measures 1.1 cm on the graph represents a persistence time of 1.1 cm * 3.6 my/cm = 4 million years.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free