Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Based on the phylogenetic tree in Figure 28.2, which of the following statements is correct?

(A) The most recent common ancestor of Excavata is older than that of SAR.

(B) The most recent common ancestor of SAR is older than that of Unikonta.

(C) The most basal (first to diverge) eukaryotic supergroup cannot be determined.

(D) Excavata is the most basal eukaryotic supergroup.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The statement โ€œthe most recent common ancestor of Excavata is older than that of SARโ€ isincorrect.

  2. The statement โ€œthe most recent common ancestor of SAR is older than that of Unikontaโ€ isincorrect.

  3. The statement โ€œthe most basal (first to diverge) eukaryotic supergroup cannot be determinedโ€ is correct.

  4. The statement โ€œExcavata is the most basal eukaryotic supergroupโ€ is incorrect.

Step by step solution

01

Excavata

Excavata is a division of the eukaryotic supergroup. These organisms possess an excavated groove in the body, and hence they are named excavates. The three clades of organisms that are found within excavate include parabasalids, diplomonads, and euglenozoans.

02

Explanation of option โ€˜(A)โ€™

The most recent form of excavata is those that possess flagellates. These organisms are often referred to as euglenozoans. These organisms are not older than SAR as they have evolved, and then these organisms developed flagella to enable locomotion.

Thus, flagellates are not older than SAR.

Therefore, the given statement is incorrect.

03

Explanation of option โ€˜(B)โ€™

Unikonata is an organism that is placed under Excavata of the eukaryotic supergroup. These organisms are very ancient forms that diverged; they were one of the oldest forms to arise. Therefore, SAR cannot be older than Unikonata.

Thus, Unikonata is the most primitive Excavata.

Therefore, the given statement is incorrect.

04

Explanation of option โ€˜(C)โ€™

The most basal or the first organism to diverge to produce a eukaryotic supergroup cannot be determined easily. This is because evolution might have caused many traits that were present in the past to go missing, and hence tracing back in time following the traits could be inappropriate.

Thus, the most primitive eukaryotic supergroup cannot be determined easily.

Therefore, the given statement is correct.

05

Explanation of option โ€˜(D)โ€™

Excavates were one of the first groups to arise from as eukaryotes as they bridged a gap between eukaryotes. However, these organisms cannot be considered the most basal organisms because no evidence has been provided.

Many organisms that evolved prior to this might have become extinct and might not have left traces.

Thus, excavata is not the most basal eukaryotic supergroup.

Therefore, the given statement is incorrect.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This micrograph shows a single-celled eukaryote, the ciliate Didinium(left), about to engulf its Paramecium prey, which is also a ciliate. Identify the eukaryotic supergroup to which ciliates belong and describe the role of endosymbiosis in the evolutionary history of that supergroup. Are these ciliates more closely related to all other protists than they are to plants, fungi, or animals? Explain.

In what sense is โ€œfungus animalโ€ a fitting description of a slime mold? In what sense is it not fitting?

Organisms interact with each other and the physical environment. In a short essay (100โ€“150 words), explain how the response of diatom populations to a drop in nutrient availability can affect both other organisms and aspects of the physical environment (such as carbon dioxide concentrations).

MAKE CONNECTIONS The bacterium Wolbachia is a symbiont that lives in mosquito cells and spreads rapidly through mosquito populations. Wolbachia can make mosquitoes resistant to infection by Plasmodium; researchers are seeking a strain that confers resistance and does not harm mosquitoes. Compare evolutionary changes that could occur if malaria control is attempted using such a Wolbachia strain versus using insecticides to kill mosquitoes. (Review Figure 28.16 and Concept 23.4.)

Which group is incorrectly paired with its description?

(A) diatomsโ€”important producers in aquatic communities

(B) red algaeโ€”eukaryotes that acquired plastids by secondary endosymbiosis

(C) apicomplexansโ€”unicellular parasites with intricate life cycles

(D) diplomonadsโ€”unicellular eukaryotes with modified mitochondria.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free